← Vermont

Tap water quality report

Southface

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 64 contaminants and detected 6. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

64
contaminants tested
6
detected
105
people served
20
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Washington

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

20
health-based violations
114
violations on file
4
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2004-12-01 → 2004-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2004-12-01 → 2004-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2004-12-01 → 2004-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2004-12-01 → 2004-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1996-12-01 → 1996-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1996-12-01 → 1996-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1996-12-01 → 1996-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1996-12-01 → 1996-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1995-10-01 → 1995-10-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1995-10-01 → 1995-10-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
1330 µg/L 102%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 2000 µg/L
40/40 SYR4 2014–2019
Lead
35.425 µg/L 236%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 68.8 µg/L
36/40 SYR4 2014–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
33/33 LCR 2023
Nitrate
150 µg/L 1.5%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
16/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/2 SYR4 2014–2017
Chloroform
2.1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/2 SYR4 2014–2017
58 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBariumBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromoformChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDibromochloromethaneDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneFluorideHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
FRAUNFELDER, JENNA
Phone
802-496-4760
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Southface

Is Southface tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 6 contaminants in Southface's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Southface's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Lead, Nitrate, Bromodichloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Southface serve?

Southface reports serving 105 people in Vermont, per its EPA record.

Has Southface had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 114 violations on file for Southface, of which 20 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 4 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.