Tap WaterIndex

← Vermont

Tap water quality report

Colonial Estates Water Corp

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 41 contaminants and detected 4. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

41
contaminants tested
4
detected
300
people served
12
health-based violations
Vermont rankingsLead in VermontPFAS in Vermont
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Rutland

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

12
health-based violations
484
violations on file
3
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2013-08-01 → 2013-08-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2013-08-01 → 2013-08-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2013-08-01 → 2013-08-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2013-08-01 → 2013-08-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2013-08-01 → 2013-08-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2013-08-01 → 2013-08-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2004-10-01 → 2004-10-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2004-10-01 → 2004-10-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2004-10-01 → 2004-10-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2002-01-01

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Nitrate
1500 µg/L 15%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
 16/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0121 mg/L 81%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 11/11 LCR 2025
Copper
139.5 µg/L 11%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 150 µg/L
8/10 SYR4 2013–2016
Lead
2 µg/L 13%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
 4/10 SYR4 2013–2016
37 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-DichloropropaneAntimony, TotalArsenicBariumBenzeneBeryllium, TotalBromodichloromethaneBromoformChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideChloroformChromiumCombined Radium (-226 And -228)DichloromethaneDibromochloromethaneEthylbenzeneFluorideMercurySeleniumStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
MATTESON, BRADFORD W
Phone
802-417-0779
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Colonial Estates Water Corp

Is Colonial Estates Water Corp tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 4 contaminants in Colonial Estates Water Corp's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Colonial Estates Water Corp's water?

EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Lead, Copper, Lead. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Colonial Estates Water Corp serve?

Colonial Estates Water Corp reports serving 300 people in Vermont, per its EPA record.

Has Colonial Estates Water Corp had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 484 violations on file for Colonial Estates Water Corp, of which 12 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 3 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.