← Vermont

Tap water quality report

Royalton Fire District 1

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 74 contaminants and detected 12. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

74
contaminants tested
12
detected
1,500
people served
4
health-based violations
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Windsor

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

4
health-based violations
73
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-10-17
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-10-17
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-10-17
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-10-17
MON Monitoring Resolved 2023-08-01 → 2023-08-31
MON Monitoring Resolved 2023-08-01 → 2023-08-31
MON Monitoring Resolved 2023-08-01 → 2023-08-31
MON Monitoring Resolved 2023-08-01 → 2023-08-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2023-01-01 → 2025-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2023-01-01 → 2025-12-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Bromodichloromethane
3.7 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.2 µg/L
41/41 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
11.2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 17.8 µg/L
41/41 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
14.97 µg/L 19%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 20 µg/L
32/33 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
2.1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.7 µg/L
30/41 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0065 mg/L 43%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
14/14 LCR 2024
Nitrate
630 µg/L 6.3%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
14/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
30.01 µg/L 50%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 35.6 µg/L
14/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
134 µg/L 10%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 170 µg/L
13/30 SYR4 2012–2018
Dichloroacetic Acid
13.08 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 14.1 µg/L
13/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
18.42 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 21.5 µg/L
12/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
5.25 µg/L 35%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 6 µg/L
6/30 SYR4 2012–2018
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
0.5380 pCi/L 11%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
1/1 SYR4 2015
62 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalArsenicAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBariumBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromoformChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDibromoacetic AcidDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneFluorideHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
MANNING, WAYNE E
Phone
802-291-0374
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Royalton Fire District 1

Is Royalton Fire District 1 tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 12 contaminants in Royalton Fire District 1's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Royalton Fire District 1's water?

EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, TTHM, Dibromochloromethane, Lead, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Royalton Fire District 1 serve?

Royalton Fire District 1 reports serving 1,500 people in Vermont, per its EPA record.

Has Royalton Fire District 1 had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 73 violations on file for Royalton Fire District 1, of which 4 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.