Tap WaterIndex

← Vermont

Tap water quality report

South Georgia Fire District

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 43 contaminants and detected 6. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

43
contaminants tested
6
detected
500
people served
15
health-based violations
Vermont rankingsLead in VermontPFAS in Vermont
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Franklin

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

15
health-based violations
73
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2009-05-01 → 2009-05-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2009-05-01 → 2009-05-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2009-05-01 → 2009-05-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1996-09-01 → 1996-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1996-09-01 → 1996-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1996-09-01 → 1996-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1996-09-01 → 1996-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1996-09-01 → 1996-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1996-09-01 → 1996-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1996-09-01 → 1996-09-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 16/16 LCR 2025
Copper
258 µg/L 20%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 350 µg/L
9/15 SYR4 2012–2018
Lead
17.97 µg/L 120%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 18.7 µg/L
2/15 SYR4 2012–2018
Barium
25 µg/L 1.3%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
 1/1 SYR4 2013
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
1.98 pCi/L 40%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
 1/1 SYR4 2015
Combined Uranium
3.42 µg/L 11%
of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
 1/1 SYR4 2019
37 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-DichloropropaneAntimony, TotalArsenicAsbestosBenzeneBeryllium, TotalBromodichloromethaneBromoformChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideChloroformChromiumDichloromethaneDibromochloromethaneEthylbenzeneFluorideMercuryNitrateSeleniumStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
VANCE, JEFFREY B
Phone
802-734-2529
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about South Georgia Fire District

Is South Georgia Fire District tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 6 contaminants in South Georgia Fire District's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in South Georgia Fire District's water?

EPA monitoring detected Lead, Copper, Lead, Barium, Combined Radium (-226 And -228), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does South Georgia Fire District serve?

South Georgia Fire District reports serving 500 people in Vermont, per its EPA record.

Has South Georgia Fire District had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 73 violations on file for South Georgia Fire District, of which 15 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.