← Vermont

Tap water quality report

Lyn Haven Fire District 1

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 49 contaminants and detected 3. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

49
contaminants tested
3
detected
100
people served
22
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Caledonia

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

22
health-based violations
91
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2012-11-01 → 2012-11-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2012-11-01 → 2012-11-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2012-11-01 → 2012-11-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2012-11-01 → 2012-11-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2012-11-01 → 2012-11-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2012-11-01 → 2012-11-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2002-05-01 → 2002-05-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2002-05-01 → 2002-05-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2002-05-01 → 2002-05-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2002-05-01 → 2002-05-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
14/14 LCR 2023
Copper
66 µg/L 5.1%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 70 µg/L
5/11 SYR4 2013–2017
Lead
1 µg/L 6.7%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
2/11 SYR4 2013–2017
46 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-DichloropropaneAntimony, TotalArsenicBariumBenzeneBeryllium, TotalBromodichloromethaneBromoformChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideChloroformChromiumCombined Radium (-226 And -228)Combined UraniumDichloromethaneDibromoacetic AcidDibromochloromethaneDichloroacetic AcidEthylbenzeneFluorideMercuryMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNitrateNitrate-NitriteSeleniumStyreneTTHMTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)Trichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl Chloridecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
SHERBURNE, HELEN
Phone
802-626-9040
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Lyn Haven Fire District 1

Is Lyn Haven Fire District 1 tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 3 contaminants in Lyn Haven Fire District 1's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Lyn Haven Fire District 1's water?

EPA monitoring detected Lead, Copper, Lead. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Lyn Haven Fire District 1 serve?

Lyn Haven Fire District 1 reports serving 100 people in Vermont, per its EPA record.

Has Lyn Haven Fire District 1 had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 91 violations on file for Lyn Haven Fire District 1, of which 22 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.