Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2017-01-01 → 2017-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2017-01-01 → 2017-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2017-01-01 → 2017-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2017-01-01 → 2017-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2017-01-01 → 2017-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2017-01-01 → 2017-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2017-01-01 → 2017-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2017-01-01 → 2017-12-31 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2015-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2015-07-01 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bromodichloromethane | 6.82 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.6 µg/L | 7/7 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 47.3 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 56 µg/L | 7/7 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 21.9 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 27 µg/L | 7/7 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 54.7 µg/L 68% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 64 µg/L | 7/7 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 43.7 µg/L 73% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 56 µg/L | 7/7 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 0.9500 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1 µg/L | 6/7 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 25.91 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 27 µg/L | 2/7 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 2.5 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/7 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
3 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about St. Johns Crossing
Is St. Johns Crossing tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 8 contaminants in St. Johns Crossing's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in St. Johns Crossing's water?
EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dichloroacetic Acid, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does St. Johns Crossing serve?
St. Johns Crossing reports serving 55 people in Virginia, per its EPA record.
Has St. Johns Crossing had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 10 violations on file for St. Johns Crossing, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.