← Virginia

Tap water quality report

Christiansburg Town of

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 44 contaminants and detected 10. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

44
contaminants tested
10
detected
22,000
people served
4
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Montgomery

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

4
health-based violations
12
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-07-01 → 2010-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-07-01 → 2010-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-07-01 → 2010-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-07-01 → 2010-07-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2023-10-01 → 2023-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2023-10-01 → 2023-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2023-10-01 → 2023-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2023-10-01 → 2023-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2023-10-01 → 2023-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2023-10-01 → 2023-12-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
52.3 µg/L 87%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 57 µg/L
128/128 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
22 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 24 µg/L
128/128 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
7.2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.9 µg/L
127/127 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
52 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 61 µg/L
127/127 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
59.7 µg/L 75%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 70 µg/L
127/127 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
28.75 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 35 µg/L
126/126 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
2.3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.4 µg/L
49/127 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
0.8000 µg/L
No EPA limit set
46/128 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
109.25 µg/L 8.4%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 114 µg/L
26/30 SYR4 2014–2017
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
12/12 LCR 2023
34 contaminants tested, none detected
11Cl-PF3OUdS4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaBromoformDibromoacetic AcidHfpo-DaLeadMonobromoacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaLithium

Utility contact

Contact
KELLEY, MIKE
Phone
540-382-6128
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Christiansburg Town of

Is Christiansburg Town of tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 10 contaminants in Christiansburg Town of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Christiansburg Town of's water?

EPA monitoring detected Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Trichloroacetic Acid, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Christiansburg Town of serve?

Christiansburg Town of reports serving 22,000 people in Virginia, per its EPA record.

Has Christiansburg Town of had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 12 violations on file for Christiansburg Town of, of which 4 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.