← Virginia

Tap water quality report

Dcpsa - Doe Branch

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 11 contaminants and detected 9. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

11
contaminants tested
9
detected
35
people served
0
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Dickenson

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
8
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MR Monitoring Resolved 2017-01-01 → 2017-03-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2017-01-01 → 2017-03-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2017-01-01 → 2017-03-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2017-01-01 → 2017-03-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2002-01-01 → 2002-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2002-01-01 → 2002-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2002-01-01 → 2002-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2002-01-01 → 2002-12-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Bromodichloromethane
12.45 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 17 µg/L
32/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
73.45 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 89 µg/L
32/32 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
85.8 µg/L 107%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 108 µg/L
32/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
55 µg/L 92%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 62 µg/L
31/31 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
25 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 33 µg/L
31/31 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
1.91 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.2 µg/L
30/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
26 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 29 µg/L
30/30 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
3.115 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.2 µg/L
18/31 SYR4 2012–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
4.66 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/31 SYR4 2012–2019
2 contaminants tested, none detected
BromoformDibromoacetic Acid

Utility contact

Contact
BAKER, DENNIS
Phone
276-835-1580
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Dcpsa - Doe Branch

Is Dcpsa - Doe Branch tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 9 contaminants in Dcpsa - Doe Branch's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Dcpsa - Doe Branch's water?

EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Trichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Dcpsa - Doe Branch serve?

Dcpsa - Doe Branch reports serving 35 people in Virginia, per its EPA record.

Has Dcpsa - Doe Branch had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 8 violations on file for Dcpsa - Doe Branch, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.