← Virginia

Tap water quality report

Shortt Gap - Bcpsa

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 14 contaminants and detected 12. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

14
contaminants tested
12
detected
64
people served
12
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Buchanan

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

12
health-based violations
60
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2018-07-01 → 2018-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2018-07-01 → 2018-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2018-07-01 → 2018-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2018-07-01 → 2018-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2018-04-01 → 2018-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2018-04-01 → 2018-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2018-04-01 → 2018-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2018-04-01 → 2018-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2018-01-01 → 2018-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2018-01-01 → 2018-03-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Bromodichloromethane
12.45 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 13 µg/L
32/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
91.35 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 103 µg/L
32/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
36.45 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 51 µg/L
32/32 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
104.7 µg/L 131%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 117 µg/L
32/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
70.9 µg/L 118%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 126 µg/L
32/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
37.9 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 59 µg/L
32/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
2.76 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5 µg/L
27/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
10.42 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 16 µg/L
10/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0010 mg/L 6.7%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
4/4 LCR 2012
Dibromoacetic Acid
1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
2/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
34.4 µg/L 2.6%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
1/5 SYR4 2012
Lead
2 µg/L 13%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
1/5 SYR4 2012
2 contaminants tested, none detected
BromoformMonobromoacetic Acid

Utility contact

Contact
VANDYKE, BRAD
Phone
276-935-5827
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Shortt Gap - Bcpsa

Is Shortt Gap - Bcpsa tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 12 contaminants in Shortt Gap - Bcpsa's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Shortt Gap - Bcpsa's water?

EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dichloroacetic Acid, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Shortt Gap - Bcpsa serve?

Shortt Gap - Bcpsa reports serving 64 people in Virginia, per its EPA record.

Has Shortt Gap - Bcpsa had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 60 violations on file for Shortt Gap - Bcpsa, of which 12 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.