Is Kwu Inc Tap Water Safe? Quality Report

Water source: GWP
Ownership: Private
Counties served: Washington

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

health-based violations

violations on file

still open

Violation	Type	Status	Period
TT	Health-based	Resolved	2020-05-01
TT	Health-based	Resolved	2020-05-01
TT	Health-based	Resolved	2020-05-01
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2014-08-01 → 2014-08-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2014-08-01 → 2014-08-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2014-08-01 → 2014-08-31
MCL	Health-based	Archived	2001-06-01 → 2001-06-30
MCL	Health-based	Archived	2001-06-01 → 2001-06-30
MCL	Health-based	Archived	1998-08-01 → 1998-08-31
MCL	Health-based	Archived	1997-11-01 → 1997-11-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.

Contaminant	Level vs EPA limit	Detection rate	Source	Period
Lead	0.0012 mg/L 8% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L	21/21	LCR	2023
TTHM	48.36 µg/L 60% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L worst single sample: 49.4 µg/L	14/14	SYR4	2014–2019
Bromodichloromethane	9.745 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 9.8 µg/L	12/12	SYR4	2014–2019
Bromoform	23.07 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 23.4 µg/L	12/12	SYR4	2014–2019
Chloroform	5.19 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 5.3 µg/L	12/12	SYR4	2014–2019
Dibromochloromethane	17.265 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 19.3 µg/L	12/12	SYR4	2014–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)	18.59 µg/L 31% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L worst single sample: 19.8 µg/L	12/14	SYR4	2014–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid	12.85 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 14.5 µg/L	11/12	SYR4	2014–2019
Copper	189.38 µg/L 15% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L worst single sample: 285.5 µg/L	10/10	SYR4	2014–2017
Dichloroacetic Acid	3.65 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 4.1 µg/L	10/12	SYR4	2014–2019
Lead	4.02 µg/L 27% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L worst single sample: 4.7 µg/L	9/10	SYR4	2014–2017
Trichloroacetic Acid	6.2 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 6.7 µg/L	6/12	SYR4	2014–2019

2 contaminants tested, none detected

Monobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic Acid

Utility contact

Contact: SENSIBA, DAVID B
Phone: 435-628-7732
Email: [email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Kwu Inc

Is Kwu Inc tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 12 contaminants in Kwu Inc's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Kwu Inc's water?

EPA monitoring detected Lead, TTHM, Bromodichloromethane, Bromoform, Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Kwu Inc serve?

Kwu Inc reports serving 460 people in Utah, per its EPA record.

Has Kwu Inc had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 51 violations on file for Kwu Inc, of which 10 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.