Tap WaterIndex

← Utah

Tap water quality report

Maeser Improvement District

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 101 contaminants and detected 13. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

101
contaminants tested
13
detected
4,152
people served
0
health-based violations
Utah rankingsLead in UtahPFAS in Utah
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Uintah

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
247
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MR Monitoring Resolved 2024-01-01 → 2024-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2024-01-01 → 2024-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2024-01-01 → 2024-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2024-01-01 → 2024-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2024-01-01 → 2024-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2024-01-01 → 2024-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2017-03-01 → 2017-03-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2017-03-01 → 2017-03-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2017-03-01 → 2017-03-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2017-02-01 → 2017-02-28

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
667.285 µg/L 51%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 1100 µg/L
30/30 SYR4 2014–2017
Lead
5.88 µg/L 39%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 9.8 µg/L
27/30 SYR4 2014–2017
Lead
0.0041 mg/L 27%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 25/25 LCR 2023
Bromodichloromethane
2.95 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.8 µg/L
18/18 SYR4 2013–2019
Chloroform
37.58 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 42 µg/L
18/18 SYR4 2013–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
12.65 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 15.2 µg/L
18/18 SYR4 2013–2019
TTHM
40.445 µg/L 51%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 45.8 µg/L
18/18 SYR4 2013–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
27.8 µg/L 46%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
 17/18 SYR4 2013–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
16.08 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 18 µg/L
17/18 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromochloromethane
0.9800 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1 µg/L
3/17 SYR4 2013–2019
Barium
50.835 µg/L 2.5%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 51 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2016–2019
Fluoride
297.365 µg/L 7.4%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 300 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2016–2019
Cyanide
2 µg/L 1%
of the EPA limit 200 µg/L
 1/2 SYR4 2016–2019
88 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromoformChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDibromoacetic AcidDinosebEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitrateOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
MCCORMICK, DUSTIN CURT
Phone
435-789-2353
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Maeser Improvement District

Is Maeser Improvement District tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 13 contaminants in Maeser Improvement District's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Maeser Improvement District's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Lead, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Maeser Improvement District serve?

Maeser Improvement District reports serving 4,152 people in Utah, per its EPA record.

Has Maeser Improvement District had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 247 violations on file for Maeser Improvement District, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.