← Texas

Tap water quality report

Fern Bluff Mud

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 44 contaminants and detected 16. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

44
contaminants tested
16
detected
5,682
people served
0
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Williamson

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
1
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MR Monitoring Resolved 2013-12-30

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
Pfpea 0.0030 µg/L 2/2 2025

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Bromodichloromethane
24.45 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 30.9 µg/L
62/62 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
24.295 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 32.2 µg/L
62/62 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
21.7 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 23.1 µg/L
62/62 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
65.735 µg/L 82%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 78.5 µg/L
62/62 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
10.01 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 11.9 µg/L
60/62 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
14.53 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 16.9 µg/L
60/62 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
29.63 µg/L 49%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 32.2 µg/L
60/62 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
389 µg/L 30%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 1020 µg/L
56/60 SYR4 2013–2019
Bromoform
16.265 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 18.6 µg/L
54/62 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
10.625 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 13 µg/L
46/62 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
14/14 LCR 2025
Monobromoacetic Acid
1.675 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2 µg/L
14/62 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
14.286 µg/L 95%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 18.3 µg/L
10/60 SYR4 2013–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
3.825 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.9 µg/L
4/62 SYR4 2012–2019
Lithium
12.3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
2/3 UCMR-5 2025
28 contaminants tested, none detected
11Cl-PF3OUdS4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaHfpo-DaNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpesPftaPftrdaPfuna

Utility contact

Contact
SABATINO, GEORGE
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Fern Bluff Mud

Is Fern Bluff Mud tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 16 contaminants in Fern Bluff Mud's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Fern Bluff Mud's water?

EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, TTHM, Dibromoacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Fern Bluff Mud serve?

Fern Bluff Mud reports serving 5,682 people in Texas, per its EPA record.

Has Fern Bluff Mud had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 1 violation on file for Fern Bluff Mud, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.