Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Unaddressed | 2026-04-01 → 2026-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Unaddressed | 2026-04-01 → 2026-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 1993-09-01 → 1993-09-30 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-10-27 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-10-27 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-08-01 → 2024-08-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-08-01 → 2024-08-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-08-01 → 2024-08-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-08-01 → 2024-08-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2013-12-30 |
PFAS detected
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dibromochloromethane | 14.135 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 30.6 µg/L | 272/277 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 18.36 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 28.6 µg/L | 255/277 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 53.35 µg/L 67% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 97.2 µg/L | 246/251 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 27.09 µg/L 45% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 33.8 µg/L | 232/248 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 24.82 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 58.3 µg/L | 225/277 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 9.69 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 20.1 µg/L | 222/277 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 6.09 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 13.5 µg/L | 222/248 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 16.595 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 21.2 µg/L | 202/248 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 350.8 µg/L 27% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 2200 µg/L | 188/203 | SYR4 | 2013–2017 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 9.475 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 15.2 µg/L | 176/248 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 12.405 µg/L 83% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 41 µg/L | 98/203 | SYR4 | 2013–2017 |
| Nitrate | 3682.5 µg/L 37% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 3870 µg/L | 68/68 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Cyanide | 170 µg/L 85% of the EPA limit 200 µg/L
worst single sample: 350 µg/L | 48/55 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Fluoride | 680 µg/L 17% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 780 µg/L | 25/25 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 54.24 µg/L 2.7% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 55.7 µg/L | 24/24 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0022 mg/L 15% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 17/17 | LCR | 2023 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 5.32 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.4 µg/L | 17/248 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 3.95 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.5 µg/L | 16/248 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lithium | 17.4 µg/L No EPA limit set | 10/22 | UCMR-5 | 2024 |
| Atrazine | 0.1700 µg/L 5.7% of the EPA limit 3 µg/L | 3/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Selenium | 2.338 µg/L 4.7% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.4 µg/L | 3/24 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Arsenic | 1.3332 µg/L 13% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.36 µg/L | 2/24 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Chromium | 3.63535 µg/L 3.6% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.78 µg/L | 2/24 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Combined Uranium | 1.195 µg/L 4% of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.2 µg/L | 2/5 | SYR4 | 2016–2018 |
| Di(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate | 1.557 µg/L 26% of the EPA limit 6 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.6 µg/L | 2/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| 2,4-D | 0.2000 µg/L 0.3% of the EPA limit 70 µg/L | 1/13 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Antimony, Total | 0.2830 µg/L 4.7% of the EPA limit 6 µg/L | 1/24 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Thallium, Total | 0.2450 µg/L 12% of the EPA limit 2 µg/L | 1/24 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
72 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about City of Georgetown
Is City of Georgetown tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 35 contaminants in City of Georgetown's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in City of Georgetown's water?
EPA monitoring detected Dibromochloromethane, Bromodichloromethane, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does City of Georgetown serve?
City of Georgetown reports serving 191,639 people in Texas, per its EPA record.
Has City of Georgetown had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 13 violations on file for City of Georgetown, of which 3 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 2 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.