← Texas

Tap water quality report

Quail Creek Mud

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 79 contaminants and detected 13. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

79
contaminants tested
13
detected
1,944
people served
66
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Victoria

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

66
health-based violations
186
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2023-07-01 → 2023-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2023-07-01 → 2023-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2023-07-01 → 2023-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2023-07-01 → 2023-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2023-04-01 → 2023-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2023-04-01 → 2023-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2023-04-01 → 2023-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2023-04-01 → 2023-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2023-04-01 → 2023-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2023-04-01 → 2023-06-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
170.75 µg/L 13%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 228 µg/L
32/32 SYR4 2012–2017
Arsenic
17.52 µg/L 175%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 25.6 µg/L
30/30 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
6.909 µg/L 46%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 7.65 µg/L
23/32 SYR4 2012–2017
Lead
0.0013 mg/L 8.5%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
7/7 LCR 2024
Bromoform
1.56 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.6 µg/L
5/12 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
3.9 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.5 µg/L
5/7 SYR4 2013–2019
TTHM
1.56 µg/L 2%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.6 µg/L
5/7 SYR4 2013–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
3.9 µg/L 6.5%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 4.5 µg/L
5/7 SYR4 2013–2019
Barium
818.9 µg/L 41%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 829 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2012–2018
Fluoride
628 µg/L 16%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 630 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2012–2018
Nitrate
20 µg/L 0.2%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
2/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
3.23 pCi/L 65%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
1/1 SYR4 2012
Selenium
11.7 µg/L 23%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
1/3 SYR4 2012–2018
66 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromodichloromethaneChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChloroformChromiumCombined UraniumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDibromochloromethaneDichloroacetic AcidDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UGross Beta Particle ActivityHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNitrate-NitriteNitriteOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
WEPPLER, RODGERS
Phone
361-212-1739
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Quail Creek Mud

Is Quail Creek Mud tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 13 contaminants in Quail Creek Mud's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Quail Creek Mud's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Arsenic, Lead, Lead, Bromoform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Quail Creek Mud serve?

Quail Creek Mud reports serving 1,944 people in Texas, per its EPA record.

Has Quail Creek Mud had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 186 violations on file for Quail Creek Mud, of which 66 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.