Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2023-12-01 → 2023-12-31 |
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2023-12-01 → 2023-12-31 |
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2023-12-01 → 2023-12-31 |
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2023-12-01 → 2023-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2018-11-01 → 2018-11-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2018-11-01 → 2018-11-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2018-11-01 → 2018-11-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2018-11-01 → 2018-11-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2005-03-01 → 2005-03-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2002-11-01 → 2002-11-30 |
PFAS detected
| Contaminant | Max | Detection rate | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pfpea | 0.0030 µg/L | 2/4 | 2024 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bromodichloromethane | 25.24 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 48.6 µg/L | 249/249 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 19.86 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 99.9 µg/L | 249/249 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 25.82 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 33.8 µg/L | 249/249 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 9.7 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 13 µg/L | 241/249 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 79.095 µg/L 99% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 153 µg/L | 238/238 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 30.375 µg/L 51% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 115 µg/L | 236/238 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 9.2 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 11.4 µg/L | 235/238 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 15.23 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 64.4 µg/L | 235/238 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chlorite | 650 µg/L 65% of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1030 µg/L | 225/231 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 7.99 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 41.3 µg/L | 223/238 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 432.5 µg/L 33% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 520 µg/L | 66/66 | SYR4 | 2012–2017 |
| Nitrate | 942.5 µg/L 9.4% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1170 µg/L | 34/34 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 5.905 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.8 µg/L | 20/238 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 6.14 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.3 µg/L | 17/238 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 16/16 | LCR | 2023 |
| Fluoride | 680 µg/L 17% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L | 11/11 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 363.1 µg/L 18% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 375 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 8.84 µg/L 59% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 9.9 µg/L | 5/66 | SYR4 | 2012–2017 |
| Atrazine | 0.2050 µg/L 6.8% of the EPA limit 3 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.2200 µg/L | 4/14 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lithium | 12.5 µg/L No EPA limit set | 3/4 | UCMR-5 | 2024 |
| Arsenic | 2.0178 µg/L 20% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.1 µg/L | 2/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Cyanide | 29 µg/L 14% of the EPA limit 200 µg/L
worst single sample: 30 µg/L | 2/3 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 426.5 µg/L 4.3% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 430 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2012–2013 |
| Chromium | 5.21 µg/L 5.2% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L | 1/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 1 pCi/L 20% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2012 |
| Dalapon | 1.1 µg/L 0.6% of the EPA limit 200 µg/L | 1/243 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Di(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate | 0.9500 µg/L 16% of the EPA limit 6 µg/L | 1/14 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Thallium, Total | 0.2000 µg/L 10% of the EPA limit 2 µg/L | 1/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
81 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about City of Victoria
Is City of Victoria tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 29 contaminants in City of Victoria's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in City of Victoria's water?
EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, Bromoform, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does City of Victoria serve?
City of Victoria reports serving 66,932 people in Texas, per its EPA record.
Has City of Victoria had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 10 violations on file for City of Victoria, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.