Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2015-06-01 → 2015-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2015-06-01 → 2015-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2015-06-01 → 2015-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2015-06-01 → 2015-06-30 |
| RPT | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-07-02 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2021-07-04 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2021-07-04 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-01-01 → 2020-03-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-01-01 → 2020-03-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-01-01 → 2020-03-31 |
PFAS detected
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 926.545 µg/L 71% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 1620 µg/L | 100/100 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Chloroform | 14.251 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 17.8 µg/L | 62/62 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 26.635 µg/L 33% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 38.5 µg/L | 62/62 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 9.355 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 15.2 µg/L | 54/62 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 11.75 µg/L 20% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 13.3 µg/L | 51/62 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 19.75 µg/L 132% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 162 µg/L | 47/100 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 6.79 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.3 µg/L | 42/62 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 4.25 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.7 µg/L | 39/62 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 6.265 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.7 µg/L | 28/62 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 2.395 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.4 µg/L | 22/62 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 4.25 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5 µg/L | 16/62 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0038 mg/L 25% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 8/8 | LCR | 2025 |
| Bromoform | 1.195 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.2 µg/L | 2/62 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
26 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Naval Air Stn Joint Reserve Base
Is Naval Air Stn Joint Reserve Base tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 18 contaminants in Naval Air Stn Joint Reserve Base's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Naval Air Stn Joint Reserve Base's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Chloroform, TTHM, Bromodichloromethane, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Naval Air Stn Joint Reserve Base serve?
Naval Air Stn Joint Reserve Base reports serving 9,000 people in Texas, per its EPA record.
Has Naval Air Stn Joint Reserve Base had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 20 violations on file for Naval Air Stn Joint Reserve Base, of which 4 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.