Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2003-04-01 → 2003-04-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2003-04-01 → 2003-04-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2003-04-01 → 2003-04-30 |
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2022-08-01 → 2022-08-31 |
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2022-08-01 → 2022-08-31 |
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2022-08-01 → 2022-08-31 |
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2022-08-01 → 2022-08-31 |
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2016-12-01 → 2016-12-31 |
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2016-12-01 → 2016-12-31 |
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2016-12-01 → 2016-12-31 |
PFAS detected
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bromodichloromethane | 20.21 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 29.7 µg/L | 250/250 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 21.655 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 24.2 µg/L | 250/250 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 9.0755 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 12.3 µg/L | 250/250 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 52.055 µg/L 65% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 59.3 µg/L | 250/250 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 18.96 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 30.4 µg/L | 249/250 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 31.36 µg/L 52% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 45.8 µg/L | 249/250 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 6.8 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 12.3 µg/L | 237/250 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 300 µg/L 23% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 971 µg/L | 188/188 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 4.675 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 17.1 µg/L | 154/250 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 2 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.9 µg/L | 100/250 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 8.15 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10.3 µg/L | 96/250 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 4 µg/L 27% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 27 µg/L | 93/188 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Bromoform | 1.8025 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 19.8 µg/L | 84/250 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0019 mg/L 13% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 16/16 | LCR | 2024 |
23 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about City of North Richland Hills
Is City of North Richland Hills tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 21 contaminants in City of North Richland Hills's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in City of North Richland Hills's water?
EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, TTHM, Dichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does City of North Richland Hills serve?
City of North Richland Hills reports serving 74,859 people in Texas, per its EPA record.
Has City of North Richland Hills had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 25 violations on file for City of North Richland Hills, of which 3 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.