← Texas

Tap water quality report

City of Euless

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 109 contaminants and detected 27. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

109
contaminants tested
27
detected
61,601
people served
3
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Tarrant

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

3
health-based violations
16
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2005-09-01 → 2005-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2005-09-01 → 2005-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2005-09-01 → 2005-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2017-01-01 → 2017-03-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2017-01-01 → 2017-03-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2017-01-01 → 2017-03-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2017-01-01 → 2017-03-31
Other Monitoring Resolved 2015-10-10
Other Monitoring Resolved 2015-10-10
MR Monitoring Resolved 2015-06-01 → 2015-06-30

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
PFBS 0.0048 µg/L 4/8 2024
Pfpea 0.0055 µg/L 4/8 2024
Pfba 0.0085 µg/L 2/8 2024
Pfhxa 0.0048 µg/L 2/8 2024

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
29.11 µg/L 49%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 33.8 µg/L
210/251 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
25.935 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 34 µg/L
190/265 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
55.2 µg/L 69%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 64.8 µg/L
189/251 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
8.66 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 12.4 µg/L
189/251 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
19.46 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 30.1 µg/L
187/265 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
311 µg/L 24%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 760 µg/L
187/188 SYR4 2012–2018
Dibromochloromethane
9.185 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 13.3 µg/L
184/265 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
17.01 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 22.3 µg/L
179/251 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
8.3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 17.3 µg/L
91/251 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.7 µg/L
88/251 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
6.105 µg/L 41%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 41 µg/L
60/188 SYR4 2012–2018
Monobromoacetic Acid
2.7 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.4 µg/L
49/251 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
2.879 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 21.5 µg/L
44/265 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate
546.05 µg/L 5.5%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 551 µg/L
32/58 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0033 mg/L 22%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
17/17 LCR 2024
Nitrate-Nitrite
541.4 µg/L 5.4%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 542 µg/L
7/11 SYR4 2012–2015
Barium
62.25 µg/L 3.1%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 64 µg/L
6/6 SYR4 2015–2019
Fluoride
2317.5 µg/L 58%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 2410 µg/L
6/6 SYR4 2012–2018
Chromium
5.26 µg/L 5.3%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 5.5 µg/L
4/6 SYR4 2015–2019
Lithium
68.7 µg/L
No EPA limit set
4/8 UCMR-5 2024
Cyanide
9.373 µg/L 4.7%
of the EPA limit 200 µg/L
worst single sample: 9.49 µg/L
2/5 SYR4 2014–2017
Nitrite
297 µg/L 30%
of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L
worst single sample: 300 µg/L
2/11 SYR4 2012–2015
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
1.5 pCi/L 30%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
1/1 SYR4 2015
82 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneCombined UraniumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UGross Beta Particle ActivityHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaOxamylPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
MARTIN, LINDA
Phone
817-685-1419

Frequently asked questions about City of Euless

Is City of Euless tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 27 contaminants in City of Euless's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in City of Euless's water?

EPA monitoring detected Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Chloroform, TTHM, Trichloroacetic Acid, Bromodichloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does City of Euless serve?

City of Euless reports serving 61,601 people in Texas, per its EPA record.

Has City of Euless had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 16 violations on file for City of Euless, of which 3 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.