Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2013-12-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2011-10-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2011-10-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2011-09-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2011-09-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2011-09-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2011-09-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2011-09-01 → 2011-09-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2011-09-01 → 2011-09-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2011-09-01 → 2011-09-30 |
PFAS detected
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chloroform | 21.925 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 30.7 µg/L | 120/136 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 18.4 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 32.3 µg/L | 119/136 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 28.515 µg/L 48% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 34.6 µg/L | 118/126 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 49.775 µg/L 62% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 65 µg/L | 116/126 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 9.701 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 12 µg/L | 115/136 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 18.02 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 23.9 µg/L | 114/126 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 8.15 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 11.3 µg/L | 111/126 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 433 µg/L 33% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 1280 µg/L | 93/93 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 3.275 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.7 µg/L | 66/126 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 2.175 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.8 µg/L | 56/126 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 8.68 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.1 µg/L | 53/126 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 3.23 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.5 µg/L | 35/136 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 7.252 µg/L 48% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 28.2 µg/L | 33/93 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate | 501.2 µg/L 5% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 539 µg/L | 30/38 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.00080 mg/L 5.3% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 15/15 | LCR | 2025 |
| Fluoride | 2048 µg/L 51% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 2060 µg/L | 5/5 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 42.685 µg/L 2.1% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 43 µg/L | 4/4 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 427.1 µg/L 4.3% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 455 µg/L | 4/4 | SYR4 | 2012–2015 |
| Chromium | 4.377 µg/L 4.4% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 4.53 µg/L | 3/4 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Arsenic | 0.9867 µg/L 9.9% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 1 µg/L | 2/4 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Atrazine | 0.1855 µg/L 6.2% of the EPA limit 3 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.1900 µg/L | 2/10 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Cyanide | 80.15 µg/L 40% of the EPA limit 200 µg/L
worst single sample: 81.6 µg/L | 2/4 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Lithium | 85.6 µg/L No EPA limit set | 2/10 | UCMR-5 | 2025 |
| Antimony, Total | 0.2970 µg/L 4.9% of the EPA limit 6 µg/L | 1/4 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Asbestos | 0.1952 MFL 2.8% of the EPA limit 7 MFL | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2012 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 1.5 pCi/L 30% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2015 |
| Nitrite | 220 µg/L 22% of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L | 1/5 | SYR4 | 2012–2016 |
| Selenium | 2.73 µg/L 5.5% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L | 1/4 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Simazine | 0.1200 µg/L 3% of the EPA limit 4 µg/L | 1/10 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Thallium, Total | 0.0150 µg/L 0.8% of the EPA limit 2 µg/L | 1/4 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
74 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about City of Bedford
Is City of Bedford tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 35 contaminants in City of Bedford's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in City of Bedford's water?
EPA monitoring detected Chloroform, Bromodichloromethane, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), TTHM, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does City of Bedford serve?
City of Bedford reports serving 49,941 people in Texas, per its EPA record.
Has City of Bedford had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 15 violations on file for City of Bedford, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.