← Texas

Tap water quality report

City of Hudson Oaks Dyegard

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 79 contaminants and detected 24. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

79
contaminants tested
24
detected
591
people served
6
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Parker

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

6
health-based violations
50
violations on file
2
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-10-17
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-10-17
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-10-17
MCL Health-based Resolved 2009-08-01 → 2009-08-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2009-08-01 → 2009-08-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2009-08-01 → 2009-08-31
Other Monitoring Unaddressed 2026-04-02
MON Monitoring Resolved 2025-07-01 → 2025-07-31
MON Monitoring Resolved 2025-07-01 → 2025-07-31
MON Monitoring Resolved 2025-07-01 → 2025-07-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
160.8 µg/L 12%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 311 µg/L
65/67 SYR4 2013–2017
Nitrate
456 µg/L 4.6%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 462 µg/L
48/48 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
7.0615 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.8 µg/L
38/41 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
3.681 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.94 µg/L
32/41 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
13.57 µg/L 17%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 14.9 µg/L
20/23 SYR4 2013–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
15.415 µg/L 26%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 61.4 µg/L
18/22 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
2.64 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.8 µg/L
17/22 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
7.151 µg/L 48%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 9.4 µg/L
14/67 SYR4 2013–2017
Fluoride
584 µg/L 15%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 598 µg/L
9/9 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
458.4 µg/L 4.6%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 462 µg/L
9/9 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
7.715 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10.2 µg/L
8/22 SYR4 2013–2019
Bromodichloromethane
4.307 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.73 µg/L
7/41 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
50.75 µg/L 2.5%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 54 µg/L
6/6 SYR4 2016–2019
Chloroform
3.6325 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.73 µg/L
6/41 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
21.54 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 26.1 µg/L
5/22 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
5/5 LCR 2023
Chromium
4.42 µg/L 4.4%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 4.5 µg/L
3/6 SYR4 2016–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
3.592 pCi/L 72%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 3.9 pCi/L
3/5 SYR4 2012–2018
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
5.35 pCi/L 36%
of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 5.5 pCi/L
3/3 SYR4 2016–2018
Monobromoacetic Acid
1.38 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.4 µg/L
3/22 SYR4 2013–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
18.91 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 20.9 µg/L
3/22 SYR4 2013–2019
Combined Uranium
2.245 µg/L 7.5%
of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.3 µg/L
2/3 SYR4 2016–2018
Di(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate
2.19 µg/L 37%
of the EPA limit 6 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.2 µg/L
2/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Toluene
0.6470 µg/L 0.1%
of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.6520 µg/L
2/19 SYR4 2012–2019
55 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalArsenicAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneGross Beta Particle ActivityHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNitriteOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
FITZPATRICK, TOM
Phone
682-229-2400
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about City of Hudson Oaks Dyegard

Is City of Hudson Oaks Dyegard tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 24 contaminants in City of Hudson Oaks Dyegard's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in City of Hudson Oaks Dyegard's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Nitrate, Bromoform, Dibromochloromethane, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does City of Hudson Oaks Dyegard serve?

City of Hudson Oaks Dyegard reports serving 591 people in Texas, per its EPA record.

Has City of Hudson Oaks Dyegard had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 50 violations on file for City of Hudson Oaks Dyegard, of which 6 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 2 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.