Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2018-12-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2018-12-30 |
PFAS detected
| Contaminant | Max | Detection rate | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pfba | 0.0078 µg/L | 2/6 | 2025 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 158.7 µg/L 12% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 297 µg/L | 63/63 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 12.21 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 16.3 µg/L | 59/59 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 22.12 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 23.9 µg/L | 59/59 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 9.96 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 15.7 µg/L | 58/59 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 59.55 µg/L 74% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 71 µg/L | 52/52 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 30.005 µg/L 50% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 32.1 µg/L | 52/52 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 9.5 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 11.9 µg/L | 51/52 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 28.62 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 40.3 µg/L | 37/59 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 21.125 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 22.1 µg/L | 36/52 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 3.629 µg/L 24% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 4.06 µg/L | 30/63 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 3.645 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5 µg/L | 30/52 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 7.525 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.9 µg/L | 26/52 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate | 136.875 µg/L 1.4% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 150 µg/L | 24/26 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 16/16 | LCR | 2024 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 3.85 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.9 µg/L | 11/52 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lithium | 15.3 µg/L No EPA limit set | 6/6 | UCMR-5 | 2025 |
| Barium | 47.4 µg/L 2.4% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 49 µg/L | 5/5 | SYR4 | 2015–2019 |
| Fluoride | 68.78 µg/L 1.7% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 69 µg/L | 5/5 | SYR4 | 2015–2019 |
| Cyanide | 98.995 µg/L 49% of the EPA limit 200 µg/L
worst single sample: 100 µg/L | 4/5 | SYR4 | 2015–2019 |
| Arsenic | 1.341 µg/L 13% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.4 µg/L | 3/5 | SYR4 | 2015–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 141 µg/L 1.4% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 150 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2015 |
86 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Parker County Sud Surface
Is Parker County Sud Surface tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 22 contaminants in Parker County Sud Surface's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Parker County Sud Surface's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Bromodichloromethane, Dibromochloromethane, Chloroform, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Parker County Sud Surface serve?
Parker County Sud Surface reports serving 6,300 people in Texas, per its EPA record.
Has Parker County Sud Surface had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 2 violations on file for Parker County Sud Surface, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.