Tap WaterIndex

← Texas

Tap water quality report

Lazy Bend Estates

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 79 contaminants and detected 18. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

79
contaminants tested
18
detected
180
people served
4
health-based violations
Texas rankingsLead in TexasPFAS in Texas
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Parker

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

4
health-based violations
14
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2019-01-01 → 2019-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2019-01-01 → 2019-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2019-01-01 → 2019-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2019-01-01 → 2019-03-31
MON Monitoring Resolved 2022-12-01 → 2022-12-31
MON Monitoring Resolved 2022-12-01 → 2022-12-31
MON Monitoring Resolved 2022-12-01 → 2022-12-31
MON Monitoring Resolved 2022-12-01 → 2022-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2010-10-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2003-09-01

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Nitrate
10680 µg/L 107%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 11700 µg/L
38/38 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
155 µg/L 12%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 170 µg/L
11/16 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
7.492 µg/L 50%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 7.7 µg/L
9/16 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
0.0091 mg/L 61%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 6/6 LCR 2025
Dibromochloromethane
3.746 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.17 µg/L
5/8 SYR4 2013–2019
Bromodichloromethane
1.568 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.59 µg/L
3/8 SYR4 2013–2019
Bromoform
4.863 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.1 µg/L
3/8 SYR4 2013–2019
Fluoride
269.3 µg/L 6.7%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 270 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2013–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
3403 µg/L 34%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 3570 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2012–2015
TTHM
6.733 µg/L 8.4%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 7.15 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2013–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
6.06 µg/L 10%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 6.3 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2013–2019
Barium
110 µg/L 5.5%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
 2/2 SYR4 2015–2018
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
1.5 pCi/L 30%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
 2/2 SYR4 2015–2018
Dibromoacetic Acid
3.78 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.9 µg/L
2/3 SYR4 2013–2019
Chromium
2.4 µg/L 2.4%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
 1/2 SYR4 2015–2018
Combined Uranium
1 µg/L 3.3%
of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
 1/2 SYR4 2015–2018
Monochloroacetic Acid
6.3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 1/3 SYR4 2013–2019
Selenium
1.7 µg/L 3.4%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
 1/2 SYR4 2015–2018
61 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalArsenicAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChloroformDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDichloroacetic AcidDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UGross Beta Particle ActivityHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidNitriteOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
FOLTZ, SCOT, W
Phone
512-990-4400
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Lazy Bend Estates

Is Lazy Bend Estates tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 18 contaminants in Lazy Bend Estates's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Lazy Bend Estates's water?

EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Copper, Lead, Lead, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Lazy Bend Estates serve?

Lazy Bend Estates reports serving 180 people in Texas, per its EPA record.

Has Lazy Bend Estates had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 14 violations on file for Lazy Bend Estates, of which 4 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.