Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-10-17 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-10-17 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-10-17 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-10-17 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-10-05 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-10-05 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-10-05 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2020-01-01 → 2020-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2020-01-01 → 2020-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2020-01-01 → 2020-03-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 1050.5 µg/L 81% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 1400 µg/L | 32/32 | SYR4 | 2013–2017 |
| Lead | 4.208 µg/L 28% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 4.8 µg/L | 27/32 | SYR4 | 2013–2017 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 24.5 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 28.4 µg/L | 21/21 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 9.39 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10 µg/L | 21/21 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 73.075 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 81.7 µg/L | 16/21 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate | 126 µg/L 1.3% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 16/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 7.73 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.2 µg/L | 15/15 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 187.4 µg/L 234% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 207 µg/L | 15/15 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 29.51 µg/L 49% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 30.7 µg/L | 15/15 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 79.21 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 87.4 µg/L | 14/21 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 20.36 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 21.8 µg/L | 13/15 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 17.05 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 17.1 µg/L | 11/15 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 2.7 µg/L No EPA limit set | 9/15 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 2.465 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.5 µg/L | 8/15 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 51.5 µg/L 2.6% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 52 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Fluoride | 1097.2 µg/L 27% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1120 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Lead | 0.0079 mg/L 53% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 3/3 | LCR | 2025 |
| Cyanide | 73.44 µg/L 37% of the EPA limit 200 µg/L
worst single sample: 75.3 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 58.915 µg/L 0.6% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 60 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Chromium | 3.7 µg/L 3.7% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L | 1/3 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Selenium | 2.06 µg/L 4.1% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L | 1/3 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
57 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about South Murvaul Wsc
Is South Murvaul Wsc tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 21 contaminants in South Murvaul Wsc's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in South Murvaul Wsc's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does South Murvaul Wsc serve?
South Murvaul Wsc reports serving 981 people in Texas, per its EPA record.
Has South Murvaul Wsc had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 51 violations on file for South Murvaul Wsc, of which 30 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 1 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.