Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Unaddressed | 2024-10-17 |
| TT | Health-based | Unaddressed | 2024-10-17 |
| TT | Health-based | Unaddressed | 2024-10-17 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2017-04-01 → 2017-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2017-04-01 → 2017-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2017-04-01 → 2017-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2017-04-01 → 2017-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Unaddressed | 2025-12-30 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-05-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-05-01 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bromodichloromethane | 15.405 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 21.9 µg/L | 52/52 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 45.435 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 63.5 µg/L | 52/52 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 26.255 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 35.7 µg/L | 52/52 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 15.265 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 18.3 µg/L | 52/52 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 77.49 µg/L 97% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 111 µg/L | 52/52 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 32.405 µg/L 54% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 40.2 µg/L | 52/52 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 22.85 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 30.9 µg/L | 51/52 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 4.16 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.8 µg/L | 49/52 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 12.94 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 16.2 µg/L | 47/52 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 3.85 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.8 µg/L | 31/52 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 190 µg/L 15% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 450 µg/L | 27/29 | SYR4 | 2015–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 3.12 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.4 µg/L | 17/52 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 8/8 | LCR | 2025 |
| Lead | 10.885 µg/L 73% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 14 µg/L | 8/29 | SYR4 | 2015–2019 |
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Sturdivant Progress Wsc
Is Sturdivant Progress Wsc tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 14 contaminants in Sturdivant Progress Wsc's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Sturdivant Progress Wsc's water?
EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Bromoform, Dibromochloromethane, Dichloroacetic Acid, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Sturdivant Progress Wsc serve?
Sturdivant Progress Wsc reports serving 3,111 people in Texas, per its EPA record.
Has Sturdivant Progress Wsc had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 74 violations on file for Sturdivant Progress Wsc, of which 7 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 7 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.