← Texas

Tap water quality report

B & B Wsc

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 14 contaminants and detected 14. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

14
contaminants tested
14
detected
3,027
people served
3
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Navarro

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

3
health-based violations
84
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Archived 2005-02-01 → 2005-02-28
MCL Health-based Archived 2005-02-01 → 2005-02-28
MCL Health-based Archived 2005-02-01 → 2005-02-28
RPT Monitoring Resolved 2025-07-02
RPT Monitoring Resolved 2025-07-02
Other Monitoring Resolved 2025-07-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2025-07-01
MON Monitoring Resolved 2025-04-01 → 2025-04-30
MON Monitoring Resolved 2025-04-01 → 2025-04-30
MON Monitoring Resolved 2025-04-01 → 2025-04-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Bromodichloromethane
18.605 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 24 µg/L
40/40 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
51.64 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 86.5 µg/L
40/40 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
70.955 µg/L 89%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 106 µg/L
40/40 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
11.11 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 11.5 µg/L
39/40 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
29.35 µg/L 49%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 37.3 µg/L
39/40 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
20.04 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 24.8 µg/L
37/40 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
12.88 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 14 µg/L
37/40 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
155 µg/L 12%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 260 µg/L
15/20 SYR4 2014–2017
Dibromoacetic Acid
4.06 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.2 µg/L
15/40 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
6 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.7 µg/L
13/40 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
2.3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
9/40 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
7/7 LCR 2025
Lead
4.4035 µg/L 29%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 4.9 µg/L
4/20 SYR4 2014–2017
Monobromoacetic Acid
1.7 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/40 SYR4 2012–2019

Utility contact

Contact
STANDLEE, JAMES
Phone
903-872-0650

Frequently asked questions about B & B Wsc

Is B & B Wsc tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 14 contaminants in B & B Wsc's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in B & B Wsc's water?

EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, TTHM, Dibromochloromethane, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does B & B Wsc serve?

B & B Wsc reports serving 3,027 people in Texas, per its EPA record.

Has B & B Wsc had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 84 violations on file for B & B Wsc, of which 3 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.