Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2015-06-01 → 2015-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2015-06-01 → 2015-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2015-06-01 → 2015-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2015-06-01 → 2015-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2010-08-01 → 2010-08-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2010-08-01 → 2010-08-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2010-08-01 → 2010-08-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2007-10-01 → 2007-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2007-10-01 → 2007-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2007-10-01 → 2007-12-31 |
PFAS detected
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bromodichloromethane | 20.68 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 26.1 µg/L | 64/64 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 72.895 µg/L 91% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 125 µg/L | 64/64 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 54.43 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 93.7 µg/L | 63/64 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 43.86 µg/L 73% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 63.2 µg/L | 63/64 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 19.49 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 27.8 µg/L | 63/64 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 22.155 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 35 µg/L | 62/64 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 8.8 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.99 µg/L | 61/64 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 256.95 µg/L 20% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 660 µg/L | 44/54 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 3.28 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.6 µg/L | 29/64 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 4.7 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.1 µg/L | 23/64 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 6.143 µg/L 41% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 13.1 µg/L | 22/54 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Bromoform | 2 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.1 µg/L | 11/64 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0036 mg/L 24% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 10/10 | LCR | 2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 1.195 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.2 µg/L | 2/64 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
27 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about M E N Wsc
Is M E N Wsc tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 17 contaminants in M E N Wsc's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in M E N Wsc's water?
EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, TTHM, Chloroform, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Trichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does M E N Wsc serve?
M E N Wsc reports serving 4,040 people in Texas, per its EPA record.
Has M E N Wsc had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 60 violations on file for M E N Wsc, of which 15 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 26 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.