← Texas

Tap water quality report

City of Nacogdoches

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 110 contaminants and detected 21. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

110
contaminants tested
21
detected
50,226
people served
20
health-based violations
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Nacogdoches

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

20
health-based violations
72
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2017-04-01 → 2017-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2017-04-01 → 2017-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2017-04-01 → 2017-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2017-04-01 → 2017-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2017-01-01 → 2017-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2017-01-01 → 2017-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2017-01-01 → 2017-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2017-01-01 → 2017-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2016-10-01 → 2016-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2016-10-01 → 2016-12-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Bromodichloromethane
16.235 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 48.6 µg/L
134/134 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
46.165 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 196 µg/L
134/134 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
9.1205 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 12.2 µg/L
132/134 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
17.5 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 25.6 µg/L
121/121 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
64.4 µg/L 81%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 256 µg/L
121/121 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
32.4 µg/L 54%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 433 µg/L
121/121 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
10 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 14.2 µg/L
121/121 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
406.8 µg/L 31%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 599 µg/L
58/96 SYR4 2013–2017
Monochloroacetic Acid
5.785 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 410 µg/L
30/121 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate
234 µg/L 2.3%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 270 µg/L
30/34 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
16.76 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 19.1 µg/L
29/121 SYR4 2012–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
4.53 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.7 µg/L
28/121 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
8.604 µg/L 57%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 12.5 µg/L
25/96 SYR4 2013–2017
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
15/15 LCR 2023
Bromoform
1.655 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.7 µg/L
10/134 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
747.25 µg/L 19%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 772 µg/L
10/10 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
54.06 µg/L 2.7%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 54.1 µg/L
9/9 SYR4 2013–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
159.55 µg/L 1.6%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 175 µg/L
3/4 SYR4 2012–2015
Arsenic
1.04 µg/L 10%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
1/9 SYR4 2013–2019
Cyanide
135 µg/L 68%
of the EPA limit 200 µg/L
1/8 SYR4 2014–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
1.5 pCi/L 30%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
1/1 SYR4 2017
89 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumCombined UraniumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UGross Beta Particle ActivityHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitriteOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
JOHNSON, RANDY
Phone
936-559-2500
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about City of Nacogdoches

Is City of Nacogdoches tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 21 contaminants in City of Nacogdoches's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in City of Nacogdoches's water?

EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, Dichloroacetic Acid, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does City of Nacogdoches serve?

City of Nacogdoches reports serving 50,226 people in Texas, per its EPA record.

Has City of Nacogdoches had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 72 violations on file for City of Nacogdoches, of which 20 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.