← Texas

Tap water quality report

Roman Forest Consolidated Mud

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 79 contaminants and detected 15. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

79
contaminants tested
15
detected
2,418
people served
0
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Montgomery

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
44
violations on file
1
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MR Monitoring Resolved 2026-02-07
MR Monitoring Resolved 2026-02-07
MR Monitoring Resolved 2026-02-07
Other Monitoring Unaddressed 2024-09-19
MR Monitoring Resolved 2023-04-01 → 2023-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2023-04-01 → 2023-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2023-04-01 → 2023-06-30
Other Monitoring Resolved 2015-01-22
Other Monitoring Resolved 2015-01-22
MR Monitoring Resolved 2014-10-01 → 2014-12-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
200 µg/L 15%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
21/21 SYR4 2014–2017
Lead
4.291 µg/L 29%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 7 µg/L
15/21 SYR4 2014–2017
Nitrate
20 µg/L 0.2%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
14/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
1.96 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.1 µg/L
8/12 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromochloromethane
1.75 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.9 µg/L
7/12 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
7/7 LCR 2023
TTHM
3.67 µg/L 4.6%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 4 µg/L
7/7 SYR4 2013–2019
Fluoride
468 µg/L 12%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 470 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2012–2018
Arsenic
4.85 µg/L 49%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 4.9 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2015–2018
Barium
139.95 µg/L 7%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 140 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2015–2018
Dibromoacetic Acid
2.045 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.1 µg/L
2/7 SYR4 2013–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
10 µg/L 0.1%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
2/3 SYR4 2013–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
2.045 µg/L 3.4%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.1 µg/L
2/7 SYR4 2013–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
1 pCi/L 20%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
1/1 SYR4 2012
Selenium
3.4 µg/L 6.8%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
1/2 SYR4 2015–2018
64 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromodichloromethaneChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChloroformChromiumCombined UraniumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDichloroacetic AcidDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UGross Beta Particle ActivityHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNitriteOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
GOSS, BILLY, W
Phone
281-689-6324

Frequently asked questions about Roman Forest Consolidated Mud

Is Roman Forest Consolidated Mud tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 15 contaminants in Roman Forest Consolidated Mud's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Roman Forest Consolidated Mud's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Nitrate, Bromoform, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Roman Forest Consolidated Mud serve?

Roman Forest Consolidated Mud reports serving 2,418 people in Texas, per its EPA record.

Has Roman Forest Consolidated Mud had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 44 violations on file for Roman Forest Consolidated Mud, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 1 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.