Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2026-02-07 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2026-02-07 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2026-02-07 |
| Other | Monitoring | Unaddressed | 2024-09-19 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2023-04-01 → 2023-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2023-04-01 → 2023-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2023-04-01 → 2023-06-30 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2015-01-22 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2015-01-22 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2014-10-01 → 2014-12-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 200 µg/L 15% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L | 21/21 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Lead | 4.291 µg/L 29% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 7 µg/L | 15/21 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Nitrate | 20 µg/L 0.2% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 14/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 1.96 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.1 µg/L | 8/12 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 1.75 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.9 µg/L | 7/12 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 7/7 | LCR | 2023 |
| TTHM | 3.67 µg/L 4.6% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 4 µg/L | 7/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Fluoride | 468 µg/L 12% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 470 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Arsenic | 4.85 µg/L 49% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 4.9 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2015–2018 |
| Barium | 139.95 µg/L 7% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 140 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2015–2018 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 2.045 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.1 µg/L | 2/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 10 µg/L 0.1% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 2/3 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 2.045 µg/L 3.4% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.1 µg/L | 2/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 1 pCi/L 20% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2012 |
| Selenium | 3.4 µg/L 6.8% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L | 1/2 | SYR4 | 2015–2018 |
64 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Roman Forest Consolidated Mud
Is Roman Forest Consolidated Mud tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 15 contaminants in Roman Forest Consolidated Mud's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Roman Forest Consolidated Mud's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Nitrate, Bromoform, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Roman Forest Consolidated Mud serve?
Roman Forest Consolidated Mud reports serving 2,418 people in Texas, per its EPA record.
Has Roman Forest Consolidated Mud had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 44 violations on file for Roman Forest Consolidated Mud, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 1 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.