Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2026-01-01 → 2026-01-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2026-01-01 → 2026-01-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2026-01-01 → 2026-01-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2026-01-01 → 2026-01-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2026-01-01 → 2026-01-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2026-01-01 → 2026-01-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-11-01 → 2024-11-30 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-11-01 → 2024-11-30 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-11-01 → 2024-11-30 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-11-01 → 2024-11-30 |
PFAS detected
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bromoform | 83.225 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 240 µg/L | 244/262 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 122.36 µg/L 153% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 372 µg/L | 237/252 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 33.55 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 98.3 µg/L | 236/262 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 13.4 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 29.4 µg/L | 235/262 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 39.285 µg/L 65% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 60.1 µg/L | 230/252 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 23.91 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 47.5 µg/L | 219/252 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 540.7 µg/L 42% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 3540 µg/L | 207/215 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 5.47 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 25 µg/L | 183/252 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 5.7 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 21.6 µg/L | 178/252 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 4.24 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.46 µg/L | 157/262 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 3.645 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.5 µg/L | 152/252 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 11.145 µg/L 74% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 190 µg/L | 100/214 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 14.13 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 23.9 µg/L | 87/252 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0015 mg/L 10% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 19/19 | LCR | 2023 |
| Lithium | 68.8 µg/L No EPA limit set | 6/6 | UCMR-5 | 2024 |
23 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about City of Midland Water Purification Plant
Is City of Midland Water Purification Plant tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 21 contaminants in City of Midland Water Purification Plant's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in City of Midland Water Purification Plant's water?
EPA monitoring detected Bromoform, TTHM, Dibromochloromethane, Bromodichloromethane, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does City of Midland Water Purification Plant serve?
City of Midland Water Purification Plant reports serving 157,000 people in Texas, per its EPA record.
Has City of Midland Water Purification Plant had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 421 violations on file for City of Midland Water Purification Plant, of which 381 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 2 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.