Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-10-17 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-10-17 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-10-17 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 1981-05-27 → 1982-05-26 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 1979-05-24 → 1980-05-23 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 1979-05-24 → 1979-06-23 |
| Other | Monitoring | Unaddressed | 2026-04-02 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Unaddressed | 2025-05-01 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bromodichloromethane | 9.8 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 43.1 µg/L | 41/41 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 7.5 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 30 µg/L | 41/41 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 30.6 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 43.3 µg/L | 41/41 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 28.5 µg/L 36% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 133 µg/L | 41/41 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 45.7 µg/L 76% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 59.7 µg/L | 41/41 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 17.93 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 55.9 µg/L | 40/41 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 7.805 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.1 µg/L | 40/41 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 4.18 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.1 µg/L | 27/41 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 8.25 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 17.4 µg/L | 24/41 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 210 µg/L 16% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 360 µg/L | 21/21 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Nitrate | 1470 µg/L 15% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 16/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 9.315 µg/L 62% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 19 µg/L | 14/21 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 7/7 | LCR | 2024 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 5.53 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.4 µg/L | 7/41 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Atrazine | 1.12 µg/L 37% of the EPA limit 3 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.4 µg/L | 6/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Fluoride | 258 µg/L 6.5% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 260 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 1.27 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.3 µg/L | 3/41 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 57.445 µg/L 2.9% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 58 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2015–2018 |
| Cyanide | 106 µg/L 53% of the EPA limit 200 µg/L
worst single sample: 110 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 1.5 pCi/L 30% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2015 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 430 µg/L 4.3% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2014 |
58 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about City of Moody
Is City of Moody tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 21 contaminants in City of Moody's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in City of Moody's water?
EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Dibromochloromethane, Dichloroacetic Acid, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does City of Moody serve?
City of Moody reports serving 1,525 people in Texas, per its EPA record.
Has City of Moody had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 41 violations on file for City of Moody, of which 6 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 3 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.