Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2015-07-01 → 2015-07-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2015-07-01 → 2015-07-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2015-07-01 → 2015-07-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2015-07-01 → 2015-07-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2014-09-01 → 2014-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2014-09-01 → 2014-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2014-09-01 → 2014-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2014-09-01 → 2014-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2013-01-01 → 2013-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2013-01-01 → 2013-03-31 |
PFAS detected
| Contaminant | Max | Detection rate | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pfba | 0.0084 µg/L | 2/3 | 2025 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 307.6 µg/L 24% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 680 µg/L | 69/80 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 18.06 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 19.1 µg/L | 64/64 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 30.96 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 159.7 µg/L | 64/64 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 21.065 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 119.1 µg/L | 64/64 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 57.26 µg/L 72% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 180.1 µg/L | 64/64 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 32.985 µg/L 55% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 356.7 µg/L | 64/64 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 9.35 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 94.7 µg/L | 64/64 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 8.71 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.5 µg/L | 59/64 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 13.8 µg/L 92% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 180 µg/L | 46/80 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 2.76 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.2 µg/L | 35/64 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 17/17 | LCR | 2026 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 7.63 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10.1 µg/L | 14/64 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 74.45 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 132.8 µg/L | 11/64 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 1.9 µg/L No EPA limit set | 8/64 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
29 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Ables Springs Sud
Is Ables Springs Sud tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 15 contaminants in Ables Springs Sud's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Ables Springs Sud's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dichloroacetic Acid, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Ables Springs Sud serve?
Ables Springs Sud reports serving 5,655 people in Texas, per its EPA record.
Has Ables Springs Sud had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 34 violations on file for Ables Springs Sud, of which 28 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.