← Texas

Tap water quality report

City of Bevil Oaks

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 79 contaminants and detected 20. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

79
contaminants tested
20
detected
1,414
people served
27
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Jefferson

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

27
health-based violations
46
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2023-10-01 → 2023-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2023-10-01 → 2023-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2023-10-01 → 2023-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2023-10-01 → 2023-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2018-07-01 → 2018-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2018-07-01 → 2018-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2018-07-01 → 2018-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2018-07-01 → 2018-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2018-07-01 → 2018-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2018-04-01 → 2018-06-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
331 µg/L 25%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 390 µg/L
60/61 SYR4 2013–2017
Bromodichloromethane
21.64 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 30.4 µg/L
45/45 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
28.9 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 32.7 µg/L
45/45 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
8.98 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 11.5 µg/L
45/45 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
39.78 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 49.1 µg/L
45/45 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
10.205 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10.9 µg/L
40/40 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
3.235 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.6 µg/L
40/40 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
23.395 µg/L 156%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 53 µg/L
40/61 SYR4 2013–2017
TTHM
89.43 µg/L 112%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 111 µg/L
40/40 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
16.005 µg/L 27%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 18 µg/L
40/40 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
2.615 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.3 µg/L
38/40 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
7/7 LCR 2023
Fluoride
789 µg/L 20%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 790 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2012–2018
Monobromoacetic Acid
1.39 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.4 µg/L
3/40 SYR4 2012–2019
Arsenic
4.695 µg/L 47%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 4.7 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2015–2018
Barium
55.925 µg/L 2.8%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 56.2 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2015–2018
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
1 pCi/L 20%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
1/1 SYR4 2012
Di(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate
1.2 µg/L 20%
of the EPA limit 6 µg/L
1/2 SYR4 2016–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/40 SYR4 2012–2019
Toluene
0.7000 µg/L 0.1%
of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L
1/5 SYR4 2015–2019
59 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumCombined UraniumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UGross Beta Particle ActivityHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNitrateNitrate-NitriteNitriteOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
MITCHELL, CHERI
Phone
409-753-1475
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about City of Bevil Oaks

Is City of Bevil Oaks tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 20 contaminants in City of Bevil Oaks's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in City of Bevil Oaks's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Bromodichloromethane, Bromoform, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does City of Bevil Oaks serve?

City of Bevil Oaks reports serving 1,414 people in Texas, per its EPA record.

Has City of Bevil Oaks had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 46 violations on file for City of Bevil Oaks, of which 27 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.