Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2023-10-01 → 2023-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2023-10-01 → 2023-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2023-10-01 → 2023-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2023-10-01 → 2023-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2018-07-01 → 2018-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2018-07-01 → 2018-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2018-07-01 → 2018-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2018-07-01 → 2018-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2018-07-01 → 2018-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2018-04-01 → 2018-06-30 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 331 µg/L 25% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 390 µg/L | 60/61 | SYR4 | 2013–2017 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 21.64 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 30.4 µg/L | 45/45 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 28.9 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 32.7 µg/L | 45/45 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 8.98 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 11.5 µg/L | 45/45 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 39.78 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 49.1 µg/L | 45/45 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 10.205 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10.9 µg/L | 40/40 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 3.235 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.6 µg/L | 40/40 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 23.395 µg/L 156% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 53 µg/L | 40/61 | SYR4 | 2013–2017 |
| TTHM | 89.43 µg/L 112% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 111 µg/L | 40/40 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 16.005 µg/L 27% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 18 µg/L | 40/40 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 2.615 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.3 µg/L | 38/40 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 7/7 | LCR | 2023 |
| Fluoride | 789 µg/L 20% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 790 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 1.39 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.4 µg/L | 3/40 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Arsenic | 4.695 µg/L 47% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 4.7 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2015–2018 |
| Barium | 55.925 µg/L 2.8% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 56.2 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2015–2018 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 1 pCi/L 20% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2012 |
| Di(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate | 1.2 µg/L 20% of the EPA limit 6 µg/L | 1/2 | SYR4 | 2016–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 2 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/40 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Toluene | 0.7000 µg/L 0.1% of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L | 1/5 | SYR4 | 2015–2019 |
59 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about City of Bevil Oaks
Is City of Bevil Oaks tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 20 contaminants in City of Bevil Oaks's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in City of Bevil Oaks's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Bromodichloromethane, Bromoform, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does City of Bevil Oaks serve?
City of Bevil Oaks reports serving 1,414 people in Texas, per its EPA record.
Has City of Bevil Oaks had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 46 violations on file for City of Bevil Oaks, of which 27 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.