← Texas

Tap water quality report

City of Nederland

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 106 contaminants and detected 15. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

106
contaminants tested
15
detected
18,157
people served
76
health-based violations
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Jefferson

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

76
health-based violations
100
violations on file
1
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2026-01-01 → 2026-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2026-01-01 → 2026-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2026-01-01 → 2026-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2026-01-01 → 2026-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2026-01-01 → 2026-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2026-01-01 → 2026-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2026-01-01 → 2026-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2026-01-01 → 2026-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Chloroform
16.935 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 19.7 µg/L
114/114 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
2.5 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3 µg/L
109/114 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
19.375 µg/L 24%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 22.2 µg/L
106/106 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
35.58 µg/L 59%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 48.7 µg/L
105/106 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
27.18 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 31.7 µg/L
104/106 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
4.01 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6 µg/L
99/106 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
420 µg/L 32%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 656 µg/L
86/95 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
11.792 µg/L 79%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 36.1 µg/L
45/95 SYR4 2013–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
12.4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 13.7 µg/L
41/106 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate
230 µg/L 2.3%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
18/18 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0018 mg/L 12%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
14/14 LCR 2025
Barium
55.19 µg/L 2.8%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 57.8 µg/L
7/7 SYR4 2013–2019
Cyanide
180 µg/L 90%
of the EPA limit 200 µg/L
worst single sample: 190 µg/L
5/6 SYR4 2014–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
1.3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/106 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrite
250 µg/L 25%
of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L
1/1 SYR4 2013
91 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromoformChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumCombined UraniumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDibromochloromethaneDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneFluorideGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UGross Beta Particle ActivityHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
DARBY, JEFFREY, P
Phone
409-723-1540

Frequently asked questions about City of Nederland

Is City of Nederland tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 15 contaminants in City of Nederland's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in City of Nederland's water?

EPA monitoring detected Chloroform, Bromodichloromethane, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Dichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does City of Nederland serve?

City of Nederland reports serving 18,157 people in Texas, per its EPA record.

Has City of Nederland had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 100 violations on file for City of Nederland, of which 76 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 1 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.