← Texas

Tap water quality report

Meeker Mwd

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 79 contaminants and detected 18. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

79
contaminants tested
18
detected
4,071
people served
57
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Jefferson

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

57
health-based violations
79
violations on file
1
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2017-04-01 → 2017-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2017-04-01 → 2017-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2017-04-01 → 2017-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2017-04-01 → 2017-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2017-01-01 → 2017-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2017-01-01 → 2017-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2017-01-01 → 2017-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2017-01-01 → 2017-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2008-09-01 → 2008-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2008-09-01 → 2008-09-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Chloroform
12.055 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 13.2 µg/L
44/48 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
105.3 µg/L 132%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 125 µg/L
35/37 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
26.87 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 29.9 µg/L
32/48 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
16.35 µg/L 27%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 17.8 µg/L
31/37 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
4.16 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.6 µg/L
29/37 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
822.8 µg/L 63%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 1380 µg/L
28/33 SYR4 2013–2017
Lead
16.14 µg/L 108%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 29.8 µg/L
22/33 SYR4 2013–2017
Dibromochloromethane
46.9 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 57.3 µg/L
21/48 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate
30 µg/L 0.3%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
18/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
22.02 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 24.9 µg/L
17/48 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
8.8 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.6 µg/L
17/37 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
4.225 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.9 µg/L
16/37 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
10/10 LCR 2024
Barium
55.865 µg/L 2.8%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 56.9 µg/L
4/4 SYR4 2014–2019
Fluoride
728.5 µg/L 18%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 730 µg/L
4/4 SYR4 2014–2017
Nitrate-Nitrite
20 µg/L 0.2%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
4/6 SYR4 2012–2015
Monochloroacetic Acid
6.13 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.3 µg/L
2/37 SYR4 2012–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
1.5 pCi/L 30%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
1/1 SYR4 2015
61 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalArsenicAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumCombined UraniumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UGross Beta Particle ActivityHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidNitriteOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
SHOWERS, TOMMY
Phone
409-782-6415

Frequently asked questions about Meeker Mwd

Is Meeker Mwd tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 18 contaminants in Meeker Mwd's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Meeker Mwd's water?

EPA monitoring detected Chloroform, TTHM, Bromodichloromethane, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Dichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Meeker Mwd serve?

Meeker Mwd reports serving 4,071 people in Texas, per its EPA record.

Has Meeker Mwd had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 79 violations on file for Meeker Mwd, of which 57 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 1 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.