Tap WaterIndex

← Texas

Tap water quality report

City of Itasca

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 79 contaminants and detected 17. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

79
contaminants tested
17
detected
1,625
people served
5
health-based violations
Texas rankingsLead in TexasPFAS in Texas
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Hill

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

5
health-based violations
110
violations on file
18
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Unaddressed 2024-10-17
TT Health-based Unaddressed 2024-10-17
TT Health-based Unaddressed 2024-10-17
TT Health-based Unaddressed 2024-10-17
MCL Health-based Archived 1991-08-01 → 1991-08-31
MR Monitoring Unaddressed 2026-01-01
MR Monitoring Unaddressed 2026-01-01
MR Monitoring Unaddressed 2026-01-01
MR Monitoring Unaddressed 2025-09-29
MR Monitoring Unaddressed 2025-09-29

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Nitrate
89 µg/L 0.9%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 100 µg/L
48/48 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
142.9 µg/L 11%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 190 µg/L
35/35 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
8.434 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10 µg/L
25/25 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
3.971 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5 µg/L
23/25 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
1064 µg/L 27%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1080 µg/L
9/9 SYR4 2012–2018
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 9/9 LCR 2026
Nitrate-Nitrite
83.2 µg/L 0.8%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 89 µg/L
9/9 SYR4 2013–2019
TTHM
15.74 µg/L 20%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 17.1 µg/L
9/9 SYR4 2013–2019
Barium
71.9 µg/L 3.6%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 74 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
1.89 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.1 µg/L
7/25 SYR4 2012–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
1.5 pCi/L 30%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
 6/6 SYR4 2012–2018
Lead
2.3 µg/L 15%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.4 µg/L
6/35 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
1.685 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.7 µg/L
4/9 SYR4 2013–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
2.635 µg/L 4.4%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.8 µg/L
4/9 SYR4 2013–2019
Selenium
9.37 µg/L 19%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 9.5 µg/L
3/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Arsenic
2.685 µg/L 27%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.7 µg/L
2/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
1.8 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 1/9 SYR4 2013–2019
62 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChloroformChromiumCombined UraniumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDichloroacetic AcidDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UGross Beta Particle ActivityHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidNitriteOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
BOULDIN, JAMES
Phone
254-687-2201
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about City of Itasca

Is City of Itasca tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 17 contaminants in City of Itasca's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in City of Itasca's water?

EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Copper, Bromoform, Dibromochloromethane, Fluoride, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does City of Itasca serve?

City of Itasca reports serving 1,625 people in Texas, per its EPA record.

Has City of Itasca had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 110 violations on file for City of Itasca, of which 5 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 18 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.