Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-10-17 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-10-17 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-10-17 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2018-04-01 → 2018-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2018-04-01 → 2018-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2018-04-01 → 2018-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2018-04-01 → 2018-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2018-01-01 → 2018-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2018-01-01 → 2018-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2018-01-01 → 2018-03-31 |
PFAS detected
| Contaminant | Max | Detection rate | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pfba | 0.0093 µg/L | 3/3 | 2024 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bromodichloromethane | 23.76 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 62.9 µg/L | 49/49 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 14.74 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 77.3 µg/L | 49/49 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 49.9 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 56 µg/L | 49/49 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 154.1 µg/L 193% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 215 µg/L | 49/49 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 38.355 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 45.5 µg/L | 48/49 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 61.25 µg/L 102% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 67.4 µg/L | 48/49 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 617.5 µg/L 48% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 930 µg/L | 46/50 | SYR4 | 2015–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 31.66 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 43.4 µg/L | 43/49 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 5 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.5 µg/L | 43/49 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 69.4 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 74.8 µg/L | 41/49 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 3.585 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.5 µg/L | 40/49 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 17.3 µg/L 115% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 35 µg/L | 30/50 | SYR4 | 2015–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 9.12 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10.2 µg/L | 28/49 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0051 mg/L 34% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 14/14 | LCR | 2026 |
| Lithium | 34.3 µg/L No EPA limit set | 4/4 | UCMR-5 | 2024 |
28 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about City of Haskell
Is City of Haskell tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 16 contaminants in City of Haskell's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in City of Haskell's water?
EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, TTHM, Dichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does City of Haskell serve?
City of Haskell reports serving 3,431 people in Texas, per its EPA record.
Has City of Haskell had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 209 violations on file for City of Haskell, of which 58 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 3 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.