← Texas

Tap water quality report

City of Pasadena El Cary Estates

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 14 contaminants and detected 13. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

14
contaminants tested
13
detected
1,470
people served
0
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Harris

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
22
violations on file
1
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
Other Monitoring Unaddressed 2022-01-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2021-12-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2021-12-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2020-10-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2020-10-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2020-10-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2016-07-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2016-07-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2015-04-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2015-04-01

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
856 µg/L 66%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 1100 µg/L
45/60 SYR4 2013–2017
Lead
38.32 µg/L 255%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 148 µg/L
45/60 SYR4 2013–2017
Bromodichloromethane
16.05 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 24.9 µg/L
31/31 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
40.15 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 51.7 µg/L
31/31 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
51.05 µg/L 64%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 88.6 µg/L
31/31 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
47.8 µg/L 80%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 71.4 µg/L
31/31 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
33.695 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 48.4 µg/L
30/31 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
14.08 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 18.7 µg/L
29/31 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
6.765 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10.7 µg/L
28/31 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
4.18 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.9 µg/L
27/31 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0020 mg/L 13%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
11/11 LCR 2025
Bromoform
2.64 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3 µg/L
9/31 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
4.4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/31 SYR4 2012–2019
1 contaminants tested, none detected
Monobromoacetic Acid

Utility contact

Contact
SCHOENBEIN, THOMAS
Phone
713-475-5545
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about City of Pasadena El Cary Estates

Is City of Pasadena El Cary Estates tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 13 contaminants in City of Pasadena El Cary Estates's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in City of Pasadena El Cary Estates's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does City of Pasadena El Cary Estates serve?

City of Pasadena El Cary Estates reports serving 1,470 people in Texas, per its EPA record.

Has City of Pasadena El Cary Estates had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 22 violations on file for City of Pasadena El Cary Estates, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 1 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.