Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2005-09-01 → 2005-09-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2005-09-01 → 2005-09-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2005-09-01 → 2005-09-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2005-09-01 → 2005-09-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2005-08-01 → 2005-08-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2005-08-01 → 2005-08-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2005-08-01 → 2005-08-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2005-08-01 → 2005-08-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 309 µg/L 24% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 1130 µg/L | 74/81 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Lead | 18 µg/L 120% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 33 µg/L | 37/81 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0022 mg/L 15% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 16/16 | LCR | 2025 |
| Nitrate | 1020 µg/L 10% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 16/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 11.89 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 12.8 µg/L | 8/15 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 24.795 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 26.3 µg/L | 8/15 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 3.795 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.9 µg/L | 8/15 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 2.9 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3 µg/L | 5/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 26.92 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 27.2 µg/L | 5/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 39.64 µg/L 66% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 39.8 µg/L | 5/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 10.06 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 11 µg/L | 5/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| TTHM | 41.275 µg/L 52% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 43 µg/L | 4/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Fluoride | 462 µg/L 12% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 490 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 938 µg/L 9.4% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1020 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Atrazine | 0.2820 µg/L 9.4% of the EPA limit 3 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.2900 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2016–2019 |
| Barium | 112.425 µg/L 5.6% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 115 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2016–2019 |
| Lithium | 12.2 µg/L No EPA limit set | 2/2 | UCMR-5 | 2023 |
| Cyanide | 150 µg/L 75% of the EPA limit 200 µg/L | 1/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 0.6400 pCi/L 13% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2015 |
| Combined Uranium | 2.1 µg/L 7% of the EPA limit 30 µg/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2015 |
| Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U | 4 pCi/L 27% of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2015 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 3.3 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Simazine | 0.1000 µg/L 2.5% of the EPA limit 4 µg/L | 1/2 | SYR4 | 2016–2019 |
86 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Ricewood Mud
Is Ricewood Mud tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 23 contaminants in Ricewood Mud's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Ricewood Mud's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Lead, Nitrate, Bromodichloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Ricewood Mud serve?
Ricewood Mud reports serving 4,908 people in Texas, per its EPA record.
Has Ricewood Mud had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 8 violations on file for Ricewood Mud, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.