Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
0
health-based violations
7
violations on file
0
still open
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MR | Monitoring | Archived | 2024-01-01 → 2024-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Archived | 2024-01-01 → 2024-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Archived | 2024-01-01 → 2024-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Archived | 2024-01-01 → 2024-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Archived | 2024-01-01 → 2024-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2013-12-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 1992-07-01 → 1993-06-30 |
PFAS detected
PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest
nationwide test results (2023–2025).
| Contaminant | Max | Detection rate | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pfba | 0.0059 µg/L | 1/2 | 2025 |
Other contaminants detected
Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is
well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the
limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there
means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a
running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this
system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a
violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it
is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 261.2 µg/L 20% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 336 µg/L | 73/82 | SYR4 | 2013–2018 |
| Lead | 26.14 µg/L 174% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 83 µg/L | 45/82 | SYR4 | 2013–2018 |
| Nitrate | 656.5 µg/L 6.6% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 670 µg/L | 30/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 16.45 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 19 µg/L | 16/24 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0015 mg/L 10% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 16/16 | LCR | 2024 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 2.24 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.5 µg/L | 14/24 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Atrazine | 0.6230 µg/L 21% of the EPA limit 3 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.6500 µg/L | 10/15 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 22.985 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 23.3 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| TTHM | 15.6 µg/L 20% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 29.225 µg/L 49% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 29.4 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 4.165 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.2 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 682.5 µg/L 6.8% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 690 µg/L | 6/6 | SYR4 | 2012–2015 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 3.42 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.7 µg/L | 5/8 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Barium | 325.7 µg/L 16% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 347 µg/L | 4/4 | SYR4 | 2016–2019 |
| Nitrite | 20 µg/L 2% of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L | 3/6 | SYR4 | 2012–2015 |
| Arsenic | 3.35 µg/L 34% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.4 µg/L | 2/4 | SYR4 | 2016–2019 |
| Fluoride | 159 µg/L 4% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 160 µg/L | 2/4 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| 2,4-D | 0.1000 µg/L 0.1% of the EPA limit 70 µg/L | 1/9 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Cyanide | 130 µg/L 65% of the EPA limit 200 µg/L | 1/4 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Combined Uranium | 1.6 µg/L 5.3% of the EPA limit 30 µg/L | 1/2 | SYR4 | 2016 |
| Di(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate | 0.8200 µg/L 14% of the EPA limit 6 µg/L | 1/15 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 0.6000 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/24 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U | 3.6 pCi/L 24% of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L | 1/2 | SYR4 | 2016 |
| Selenium | 9.4 µg/L 19% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L | 1/4 | SYR4 | 2016–2019 |
| Simazine | 0.0900 µg/L 2.3% of the EPA limit 4 µg/L | 1/15 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Xylenes, Total | 0.7000 µg/L 0% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 1/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
81 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalAsbestosBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromoformChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDibromoacetic AcidDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneGross Beta Particle ActivityHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaOxamylPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl Chloridecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Faulkey Gully Mud
Is Faulkey Gully Mud tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 27 contaminants in Faulkey Gully Mud's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Faulkey Gully Mud's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Nitrate, Chloroform, Lead, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Faulkey Gully Mud serve?
Faulkey Gully Mud reports serving 8,907 people in Texas, per its EPA record.
Has Faulkey Gully Mud had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 7 violations on file for Faulkey Gully Mud, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.