Tap WaterIndex

← Texas

Tap water quality report

Heatherloch Mud

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 109 contaminants and detected 28. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

109
contaminants tested
28
detected
6,612
people served
5
health-based violations
Texas rankingsLead in TexasPFAS in Texas
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Harris

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

5
health-based violations
31
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2009-05-01 → 2009-05-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2009-05-01 → 2009-05-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2009-05-01 → 2009-05-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2009-05-01 → 2009-05-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2009-05-01 → 2009-05-31
Other Monitoring Resolved 2017-07-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2017-07-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2016-05-12
Other Monitoring Resolved 2016-05-12
Other Monitoring Resolved 2016-03-11

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
Pfba 0.0076 µg/L 3/4 2024
Pfhxa 0.0055 µg/L 2/4 2024
Pfpea 0.0072 µg/L 2/4 2024
6:2 Fts 0.0063 µg/L 1/4 2024
PFBS 0.0040 µg/L 1/4 2024

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
114.6 µg/L 8.8%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 622 µg/L
69/82 SYR4 2013–2018
Lead
13.44 µg/L 90%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 48.9 µg/L
40/82 SYR4 2013–2018
Chloroform
15.2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 19 µg/L
37/37 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
5.28 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.1 µg/L
33/37 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate
1660 µg/L 17%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
 16/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0016 mg/L 11%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 15/15 LCR 2023
Dibromochloromethane
7.105 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.7 µg/L
8/37 SYR4 2012–2019
Atrazine
0.4580 µg/L 15%
of the EPA limit 3 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.4700 µg/L
7/11 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
18.44 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 18.8 µg/L
7/7 SYR4 2013–2019
TTHM
28.71 µg/L 36%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 33 µg/L
7/7 SYR4 2013–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
23.56 µg/L 39%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 23.8 µg/L
7/7 SYR4 2013–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
3.17 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.2 µg/L
7/7 SYR4 2013–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
3.66 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.8 µg/L
3/7 SYR4 2013–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
942 µg/L 9.4%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 970 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2012–2015
Nitrite
19 µg/L 1.9%
of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L
worst single sample: 20 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2012–2015
Barium
122.53 µg/L 6.1%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 126 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2014–2017
Bromoform
2.675 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.7 µg/L
2/37 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
129 µg/L 3.2%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 130 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2014–2017
Simazine
0.2125 µg/L 5.3%
of the EPA limit 4 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.2200 µg/L
2/11 SYR4 2012–2019
Cyanide
30 µg/L 15%
of the EPA limit 200 µg/L
 1/2 SYR4 2014–2017
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
1.5 pCi/L 30%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
 1/1 SYR4 2016
Di(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate
0.8400 µg/L 14%
of the EPA limit 6 µg/L
 1/11 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
1.8 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 1/7 SYR4 2013–2019
81 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicAsbestosBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumCombined UraniumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UGross Beta Particle ActivityHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaOxamylPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
VERRETT, WAYNE
Phone
713-651-0111

Frequently asked questions about Heatherloch Mud

Is Heatherloch Mud tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 28 contaminants in Heatherloch Mud's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Heatherloch Mud's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Chloroform, Bromodichloromethane, Nitrate, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Heatherloch Mud serve?

Heatherloch Mud reports serving 6,612 people in Texas, per its EPA record.

Has Heatherloch Mud had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 31 violations on file for Heatherloch Mud, of which 5 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.