Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| RPT | Monitoring | Unaddressed | 2025-07-02 |
| Other | Monitoring | Unaddressed | 2019-04-06 |
| Other | Monitoring | Unaddressed | 2019-04-06 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2017-01-01 → 2017-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2017-01-01 → 2017-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2017-01-01 → 2017-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2015-01-01 → 2017-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2015-01-01 → 2017-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2015-01-01 → 2017-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 1992-07-01 → 1993-06-30 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 44.78 µg/L 3.4% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 412.8 µg/L | 60/61 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Bromoform | 6.465 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.6 µg/L | 30/67 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 9.1 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 12.7 µg/L | 29/67 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 22.26 µg/L 37% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 23.8 µg/L | 29/62 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 31.885 µg/L 40% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 33.9 µg/L | 28/62 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 3.2 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.7 µg/L | 26/62 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 7.38 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9 µg/L | 19/67 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 4.695 µg/L 31% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 7.5 µg/L | 18/61 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 0.00096 mg/L 6.4% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 15/15 | LCR | 2025 |
| Nitrate | 40 µg/L 0.4% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 12/14 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 16.9 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 17.7 µg/L | 11/62 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 14.7 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 15 µg/L | 7/67 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 6.8 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.9 µg/L | 6/62 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lithium | 21.7 µg/L No EPA limit set | 4/4 | UCMR-5 | 2023 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 29 µg/L 0.3% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 30 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2015 |
| Arsenic | 5.155 µg/L 52% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 5.3 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2016–2019 |
| Barium | 232.685 µg/L 12% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 240 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2016–2019 |
| Cyanide | 90 µg/L 45% of the EPA limit 200 µg/L | 1/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Fluoride | 280 µg/L 7% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2014 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 2.6 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/62 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrite | 10 µg/L 1% of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L | 1/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2015 |
| Selenium | 3.2 µg/L 6.4% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L | 1/2 | SYR4 | 2016–2019 |
83 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Harris County Mud 5
Is Harris County Mud 5 tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 22 contaminants in Harris County Mud 5's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Harris County Mud 5's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Bromoform, Dibromochloromethane, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Harris County Mud 5 serve?
Harris County Mud 5 reports serving 5,487 people in Texas, per its EPA record.
Has Harris County Mud 5 had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 10 violations on file for Harris County Mud 5, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 3 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.