← Texas

Tap water quality report

Cypress Creek Utility District

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 78 contaminants and detected 15. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

78
contaminants tested
15
detected
2,988
people served
0
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Harris

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
10
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MR Monitoring Resolved 2019-10-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2019-10-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2019-10-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2019-10-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2013-12-30
Other Monitoring Resolved 2007-07-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2007-07-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2006-01-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2006-01-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 1992-07-01 → 1993-06-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
135 µg/L 10%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 180 µg/L
16/22 SYR4 2013–2017
Nitrate
190 µg/L 1.9%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
16/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0145 mg/L 97%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
12/12 LCR 2025
Lead
5.98 µg/L 40%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 6.69 µg/L
11/22 SYR4 2013–2017
Dibromochloromethane
1.685 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.7 µg/L
4/15 SYR4 2012–2019
Arsenic
4.41 µg/L 44%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 4.5 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2016–2019
Barium
274.9 µg/L 14%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 275 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2016–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
179 µg/L 1.8%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 190 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2012–2015
Bromodichloromethane
0.8900 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.9000 µg/L
2/15 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
0.7900 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.8000 µg/L
2/15 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
0.7850 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.8000 µg/L
2/15 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
408 µg/L 10%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 420 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2014–2017
Selenium
10.435 µg/L 21%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 10.7 µg/L
2/3 SYR4 2016–2019
Di(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate
0.8200 µg/L 14%
of the EPA limit 6 µg/L
1/2 SYR4 2015–2018
TTHM
1.7 µg/L 2.1%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
1/7 SYR4 2013–2019
63 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumCombined UraniumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDibromoacetic AcidDichloroacetic AcidDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UGross Beta Particle ActivityHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNitriteOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)ToxapheneTrichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
CAMP, ROBERT
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Cypress Creek Utility District

Is Cypress Creek Utility District tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 15 contaminants in Cypress Creek Utility District's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Cypress Creek Utility District's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Nitrate, Lead, Lead, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Cypress Creek Utility District serve?

Cypress Creek Utility District reports serving 2,988 people in Texas, per its EPA record.

Has Cypress Creek Utility District had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 10 violations on file for Cypress Creek Utility District, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.