Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
1
health-based violations
38
violations on file
0
still open
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 1984-03-20 → 1985-03-19 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2022-01-30 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2022-01-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-10-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-10-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-10-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-10-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Archived | 2019-01-01 → 2021-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Archived | 2019-01-01 → 2021-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Archived | 2019-01-01 → 2021-12-31 |
PFAS detected
PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest
nationwide test results (2023–2025).
Other contaminants detected
Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is
well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the
limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there
means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a
running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this
system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a
violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it
is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 980.965 µg/L 75% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 1904.9 µg/L | 214/223 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 13.035 µg/L 87% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 70.3 µg/L | 200/223 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 12.9 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 19 µg/L | 141/143 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 34.4 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 47.5 µg/L | 139/143 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 52 µg/L 65% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 77.3 µg/L | 124/124 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 43.61 µg/L 73% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 58.7 µg/L | 123/124 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 12.3 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 43 µg/L | 121/143 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 30.2 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 42.7 µg/L | 120/124 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 9.31 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 16 µg/L | 119/124 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 4 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.9 µg/L | 68/124 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate | 700 µg/L 7% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 820 µg/L | 58/60 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 26.105 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 79 µg/L | 40/143 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0038 mg/L 25% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 23/23 | LCR | 2025 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 6.82 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10 µg/L | 22/124 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 598 µg/L 6% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 610 µg/L | 13/13 | SYR4 | 2012–2015 |
| Atrazine | 0.3320 µg/L 11% of the EPA limit 3 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.3600 µg/L | 9/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 137.7 µg/L 6.9% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 147 µg/L | 7/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Simazine | 0.1500 µg/L 3.8% of the EPA limit 4 µg/L | 7/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Fluoride | 2542.5 µg/L 64% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 3040 µg/L | 6/6 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Nitrite | 20 µg/L 2% of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L | 5/13 | SYR4 | 2012–2015 |
| Arsenic | 2.49 µg/L 25% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.5 µg/L | 2/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 1.5 pCi/L 30% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2016 |
| Dalapon | 1.1 µg/L 0.6% of the EPA limit 200 µg/L | 1/130 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Di(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate | 0.9300 µg/L 16% of the EPA limit 6 µg/L | 1/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Xylenes, Total | 0.5000 µg/L 0% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 1/19 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
77 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumCombined UraniumDichloromethaneDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UGross Beta Particle ActivityHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaOxamylPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl Chloridecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Clear Brook City Mud
Is Clear Brook City Mud tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 31 contaminants in Clear Brook City Mud's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Clear Brook City Mud's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Clear Brook City Mud serve?
Clear Brook City Mud reports serving 18,108 people in Texas, per its EPA record.
Has Clear Brook City Mud had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 38 violations on file for Clear Brook City Mud, of which 1 is health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.