← Texas

Tap water quality report

Timber Lane Utility District

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 109 contaminants and detected 26. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

109
contaminants tested
26
detected
24,507
people served
4
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Harris

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

4
health-based violations
9
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2014-03-01 → 2014-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2014-03-01 → 2014-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2014-03-01 → 2014-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2014-03-01 → 2014-03-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2026-04-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2026-04-01
RPT Monitoring Resolved 2025-07-02
Other Monitoring Resolved 2005-07-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 1992-07-01 → 1993-06-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Dibromochloromethane
3.78 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 11 µg/L
93/134 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
8.24 µg/L 10%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 10.7 µg/L
83/106 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
105.65 µg/L 8.1%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 130 µg/L
70/97 SYR4 2013–2019
Nitrate
320 µg/L 3.2%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
60/64 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
3.43 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10 µg/L
58/134 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
3.415 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.6 µg/L
52/134 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
5.885 µg/L 39%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 12.1 µg/L
31/97 SYR4 2013–2019
Chloroform
3.005 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.6 µg/L
18/134 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0021 mg/L 14%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
16/16 LCR 2025
Dibromoacetic Acid
13.68 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 13.9 µg/L
12/106 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
25.1 µg/L 42%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 26.2 µg/L
12/106 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
860 µg/L 22%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
10/10 SYR4 2012–2018
Nitrate-Nitrite
311 µg/L 3.1%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 320 µg/L
10/12 SYR4 2012–2019
Xylenes, Total
9.78 µg/L 0.1%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 15 µg/L
10/28 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
11.48 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 12.2 µg/L
9/106 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
276.75 µg/L 14%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 282 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2014–2018
Trichloroacetic Acid
11.2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 12.7 µg/L
7/106 SYR4 2012–2019
Arsenic
3.75 µg/L 38%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.8 µg/L
6/8 SYR4 2014–2018
Lithium
19.1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
5/8 UCMR-5 2025
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
2.792 pCi/L 56%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 2.86 pCi/L
2/3 SYR4 2015–2017
Ethylbenzene
1.735 µg/L 0.2%
of the EPA limit 700 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.8 µg/L
2/28 SYR4 2012–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
1.495 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.5 µg/L
2/106 SYR4 2012–2019
Selenium
3.29 µg/L 6.6%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.3 µg/L
2/8 SYR4 2014–2018
Cyanide
10 µg/L 5%
of the EPA limit 200 µg/L
1/8 SYR4 2014–2017
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
4 pCi/L 27%
of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
1/4 SYR4 2015–2017
Toluene
0.7000 µg/L 0.1%
of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L
1/28 SYR4 2012–2019
83 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumCombined UraniumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinGross Beta Particle ActivityHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonochloroacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitriteOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl Chloridecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
MEACHAM, DANIEL, M
Phone
713-652-6500

Frequently asked questions about Timber Lane Utility District

Is Timber Lane Utility District tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 26 contaminants in Timber Lane Utility District's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Timber Lane Utility District's water?

EPA monitoring detected Dibromochloromethane, TTHM, Copper, Nitrate, Bromoform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Timber Lane Utility District serve?

Timber Lane Utility District reports serving 24,507 people in Texas, per its EPA record.

Has Timber Lane Utility District had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 9 violations on file for Timber Lane Utility District, of which 4 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.