Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| RPT | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-07-02 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2013-10-01 |
PFAS detected
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bromodichloromethane | 11.4 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 14 µg/L | 130/131 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 31.285 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 40 µg/L | 130/131 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 28.055 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 52.5 µg/L | 124/124 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 44 µg/L 55% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 49.6 µg/L | 124/124 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 38.24 µg/L 64% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 67.5 µg/L | 124/124 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 8.555 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 13 µg/L | 124/124 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 4.815 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 16.4 µg/L | 118/131 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 673.6 µg/L 52% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 1370 µg/L | 75/81 | SYR4 | 2013–2017 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 2.9 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.8 µg/L | 61/124 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 6.279 µg/L 42% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 20 µg/L | 55/81 | SYR4 | 2013–2017 |
| Nitrate | 750 µg/L 7.5% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 820 µg/L | 42/42 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 7.48 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 22.3 µg/L | 39/131 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrite | 630 µg/L 63% of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L
worst single sample: 740 µg/L | 26/35 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 10.375 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 13.6 µg/L | 16/124 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 15/15 | LCR | 2023 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 1490 µg/L 15% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 11/11 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Atrazine | 0.3360 µg/L 11% of the EPA limit 3 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.3600 µg/L | 9/12 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Simazine | 0.1575 µg/L 3.9% of the EPA limit 4 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.1600 µg/L | 6/12 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 122.24 µg/L 6.1% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 128 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2014–2018 |
| Fluoride | 737 µg/L 18% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 750 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2014–2018 |
| Lithium | 19.8 µg/L No EPA limit set | 3/6 | UCMR-5 | 2023 |
| Cyanide | 67.5 µg/L 34% of the EPA limit 200 µg/L
worst single sample: 70 µg/L | 2/3 | SYR4 | 2014–2018 |
| Di(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate | 1.3 µg/L 22% of the EPA limit 6 µg/L | 1/12 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Xylenes, Total | 0.7000 µg/L 0% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 1/7 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
79 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about City of Seabrook
Is City of Seabrook tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 29 contaminants in City of Seabrook's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in City of Seabrook's water?
EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dichloroacetic Acid, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does City of Seabrook serve?
City of Seabrook reports serving 13,560 people in Texas, per its EPA record.
Has City of Seabrook had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 2 violations on file for City of Seabrook, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.