← Texas

Tap water quality report

Green Valley Sud

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 108 contaminants and detected 23. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

108
contaminants tested
23
detected
52,497
people served
4
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Guadalupe

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

4
health-based violations
62
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2014-04-01 → 2014-04-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2014-04-01 → 2014-04-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2014-04-01 → 2014-04-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2014-04-01 → 2014-04-30
Other Monitoring Resolved 2025-10-03
Other Monitoring Resolved 2025-10-03
Other Monitoring Resolved 2024-07-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2024-07-01
MON Monitoring Resolved 2024-07-01 → 2024-07-31
MON Monitoring Resolved 2024-07-01 → 2024-07-31

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
Pfpea 0.0049 µg/L 4/12 2023

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
280 µg/L 22%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 760 µg/L
181/187 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromochloromethane
8.67 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 20.3 µg/L
112/144 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
23.95 µg/L 30%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 67.4 µg/L
106/129 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
7.58 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 24.2 µg/L
95/144 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
5.645 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.6 µg/L
94/144 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate
2190 µg/L 22%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 2340 µg/L
88/100 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
6.385 µg/L 43%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 19.3 µg/L
84/187 SYR4 2013–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
19.63 µg/L 33%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 55 µg/L
64/129 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
11.5 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 25.1 µg/L
57/144 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
5.245 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.2 µg/L
52/129 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
13.04 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 32.3 µg/L
45/129 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
2082 µg/L 21%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 2120 µg/L
20/23 SYR4 2012–2015
Trichloroacetic Acid
4.855 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.7 µg/L
20/129 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0018 mg/L 12%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
16/16 LCR 2025
Barium
41.18 µg/L 2.1%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 41.9 µg/L
9/9 SYR4 2016–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
7.445 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.6 µg/L
8/129 SYR4 2012–2019
Xylenes, Total
7.8 µg/L 0.1%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 9.2 µg/L
8/15 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
729 µg/L 18%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 750 µg/L
7/7 SYR4 2013–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
8.205 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9 µg/L
4/129 SYR4 2012–2019
Ethylbenzene
1.16 µg/L 0.2%
of the EPA limit 700 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.2 µg/L
3/15 SYR4 2012–2019
Lithium
41 µg/L
No EPA limit set
2/12 UCMR-5 2023
Di(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate
0.9200 µg/L 15%
of the EPA limit 6 µg/L
1/13 SYR4 2012–2019
85 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumCombined UraniumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UGross Beta Particle ActivityHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitriteOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl Chloridecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
FRIAS, JOHN
Phone
210-279-3960
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Green Valley Sud

Is Green Valley Sud tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 23 contaminants in Green Valley Sud's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Green Valley Sud's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Dibromochloromethane, TTHM, Bromodichloromethane, Bromoform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Green Valley Sud serve?

Green Valley Sud reports serving 52,497 people in Texas, per its EPA record.

Has Green Valley Sud had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 62 violations on file for Green Valley Sud, of which 4 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.