Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2022-06-01 → 2022-11-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2022-06-01 → 2022-11-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2022-06-01 → 2022-11-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2022-06-01 → 2022-11-30 |
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2021-06-01 → 2021-06-30 |
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2021-06-01 → 2021-06-30 |
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2021-06-01 → 2021-06-30 |
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2021-06-01 → 2021-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2018-04-01 → 2018-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2018-04-01 → 2018-06-30 |
PFAS detected
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 440.5 µg/L 34% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 830 µg/L | 200/206 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 16.3 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 22.3 µg/L | 89/116 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 109.055 µg/L 136% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 133.6 µg/L | 88/116 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 40.67 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 44.9 µg/L | 79/116 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 22.495 µg/L 37% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 25 µg/L | 72/116 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 38.655 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 49.1 µg/L | 54/116 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 9 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.3 µg/L | 46/116 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 24.4 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 28.4 µg/L | 42/116 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 9.556 µg/L 64% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 45 µg/L | 39/206 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 4.875 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.8 µg/L | 38/116 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 5 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.3 µg/L | 33/116 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 11.3 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 12.8 µg/L | 31/116 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 2.5 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.6 µg/L | 21/116 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0046 mg/L 31% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 12/12 | LCR | 2025 |
| Lithium | 62.6 µg/L No EPA limit set | 8/8 | UCMR-5 | 2024 |
27 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about East Biggs Water
Is East Biggs Water tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 17 contaminants in East Biggs Water's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in East Biggs Water's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Bromoform, TTHM, Dibromochloromethane, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does East Biggs Water serve?
East Biggs Water reports serving 15,000 people in California, per its EPA record.
Has East Biggs Water had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 16 violations on file for East Biggs Water, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.