Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2025-01-01 → 2025-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2025-01-01 → 2025-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2025-01-01 → 2025-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2025-01-01 → 2025-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2025-01-01 → 2025-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2025-01-01 → 2025-03-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-10-17 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-10-17 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-10-17 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-10-17 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 708.7 µg/L 55% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 2460 µg/L | 39/42 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 40.445 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 69.4 µg/L | 32/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 81.585 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 87.6 µg/L | 32/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 24.945 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 56.3 µg/L | 32/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 134.5 µg/L 168% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 199 µg/L | 32/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 79.84 µg/L 133% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 109 µg/L | 32/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 5.25 µg/L 35% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 48 µg/L | 31/42 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 28.435 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 48.5 µg/L | 30/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 46.78 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 51.1 µg/L | 29/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 13.87 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 14 µg/L | 22/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 12.17 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 14.7 µg/L | 22/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0027 mg/L 18% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 16/16 | LCR | 2025 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 6.8 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.6 µg/L | 16/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 3.63 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.4 µg/L | 15/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Staff Wsc Lacasa Area
Is Staff Wsc Lacasa Area tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 14 contaminants in Staff Wsc Lacasa Area's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Staff Wsc Lacasa Area's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Staff Wsc Lacasa Area serve?
Staff Wsc Lacasa Area reports serving 348 people in Texas, per its EPA record.
Has Staff Wsc Lacasa Area had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 198 violations on file for Staff Wsc Lacasa Area, of which 146 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.