Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2016-11-01 → 2016-11-30 |
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2016-11-01 → 2016-11-30 |
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2016-11-01 → 2016-11-30 |
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2016-11-01 → 2016-11-30 |
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2016-11-01 → 2016-11-30 |
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2016-11-01 → 2016-11-30 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2015-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2015-07-01 |
PFAS detected
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTHM | 43.58 µg/L 54% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 53.5 µg/L | 249/249 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 28.94 µg/L 48% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 34.3 µg/L | 249/249 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 10.6 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 12.9 µg/L | 248/249 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 26.13 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 36.2 µg/L | 248/249 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 21.965 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 26.1 µg/L | 248/249 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 6.4 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.89 µg/L | 242/249 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 4.1 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.2 µg/L | 222/249 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 340.2 µg/L 26% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 562 µg/L | 150/150 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 2.74 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9 µg/L | 133/249 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 4.97 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.4 µg/L | 127/249 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 5.1805 µg/L 35% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 29.4 µg/L | 82/150 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Bromoform | 3.121 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.54 µg/L | 67/249 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 2.815 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.1 µg/L | 58/249 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0010 mg/L 6.7% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 15/15 | LCR | 2024 |
| Lithium | 9.99 µg/L No EPA limit set | 5/12 | UCMR-5 | 2024 |
21 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about City of Irving
Is City of Irving tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 23 contaminants in City of Irving's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in City of Irving's water?
EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does City of Irving serve?
City of Irving reports serving 264,546 people in Texas, per its EPA record.
Has City of Irving had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 8 violations on file for City of Irving, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.