Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-10-17 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-10-17 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-10-17 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-10-17 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2012-03-01 → 2012-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2012-03-01 → 2012-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2012-03-01 → 2012-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2012-03-01 → 2012-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2010-05-01 → 2010-05-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2010-05-01 → 2010-05-31 |
PFAS detected
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bromodichloromethane | 7.278 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.8 µg/L | 125/125 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 9.508 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 13.6 µg/L | 125/125 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 19.24 µg/L 24% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 25.2 µg/L | 125/125 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 5.83 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.1 µg/L | 121/125 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 21.21 µg/L 35% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 29.2 µg/L | 119/125 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 14.445 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 20.5 µg/L | 114/125 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 479.4 µg/L 37% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 929 µg/L | 90/90 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 2.155 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.7 µg/L | 70/125 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 5.75 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.4 µg/L | 51/125 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 8.43 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10.2 µg/L | 42/125 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 2.8 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.1 µg/L | 41/125 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 2.02 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.3 µg/L | 25/125 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 4.82 µg/L 32% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 8.2 µg/L | 14/90 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 13/13 | LCR | 2025 |
25 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about City of Seagoville
Is City of Seagoville tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 19 contaminants in City of Seagoville's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in City of Seagoville's water?
EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, TTHM, Dibromochloromethane, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does City of Seagoville serve?
City of Seagoville reports serving 20,156 people in Texas, per its EPA record.
Has City of Seagoville had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 90 violations on file for City of Seagoville, of which 28 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.